[arch-haskell] Re: Re-running cabal2arch on HackageDB [was: cabal2arch 0.6: now builds haddocks for libraries]
dons at galois.com
Sat Oct 12 07:35:26 UTC 2013
> Don Stewart wrote:
>> Thanks Magnus for the patch. Note this means ghc <=> haddock need to
>> stay in sync.
> On a somewhat related note. Is someone keeping track of what version of
> cabal2arch was used to "Arch-ify" what haskell packages? (Or is there a
> way to ask AUR about it?)
> I'm not saying all packages should be re-processed *every time*
> cabal2arch is upgraded, but it might be worth doing for *some* upgrades
> to cabal2arch. Adding building of docs could be one time when it's
> justified to re-run cabal2arch over all packages on Hackage. If we in
> the future add building of profiling then that might also be reason to do
> the same.
The PKGBUILD lists the version. At the moment I update only when the
package updates on hackage. We might want a different policy.
More information about the arch-haskell