[arch-haskell] Re: Building docs with binary (patch for cabal2arch)

Magnus Therning magnus at therning.org
Sat Oct 12 07:35:24 UTC 2013

Don Stewart wrote:
> Do we also need to add haddock as a required makedepends (build time
> only dependency on everything) ?

I'm not sure why the version shipped with GHC wouldn't be enough.

My only experience with haddock problems was on Debian.  They managed to get
into the situation where haddock couldn't handle some language constructs that
the current version of GHC was perfectly happy with (old version of haddock,
compiled with old version of GHC).  The solution for them was to wait for GHC
6.10 because haddock would then be distributed with GHC.


Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org          Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131012/5c89725b/attachment.sig>

More information about the arch-haskell mailing list