[arch-haskell] ghc-6.10.2 in testing

Peter Hercek phercek at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 07:34:40 UTC 2013

Don Stewart wrote:
> vegai:
>> I'm interested in ideas how to mitigate these issues... now, it seems
>> to me that they cannot very much, and the most we can do is unregister
>> everything prior to upgrading and informing the user of this.
> Right.
> If we could at least list the names (and commands to reinstall )
> packages that are about to break (all haskell-* on the system), that
> might be nice.
> Essentially, something like:
>     "WARNING: the following packages will need to be reinstalled:
>         pacman -Qs haskell

If I understand it correctly all libraries need to be reinstalled and 
executables can stay.
Is naming convention designed in such a way that "pacman -Qs haskell" 
should get the same result as "pacman -Qi ghc |grep '^Required By'"?


More information about the arch-haskell mailing list