[arch-haskell] local docs bugged?

[Magnus Therning]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:44:42PM -0500, tam at hiddenrock.com wrote:
> > AFAIK we don't do anything special when generating the documentation so this
> > feels like an upstream bug.
> 
> I thought so, too, but I couldn't figure out what the upstream intent was
> because, as you say, we just use what they give us here.  I thought somebody
> around here might have an idea, rather than me just pushing it upstream
> directly.
> 
> > Maybe we should drop the use of the upstream script and use something
> > simpler instead.  This seems to work well enough:
> 
> Works for me!  Thanks.

Good.

Note that the ghc package is excluded (which it is in the upstream
setup as well).

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with
millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural
integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
     -- Alan Kay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20130104/c3d5a5c0/attachment.pgp>