[arch-haskell] Haskell's state in Arch & near future
magnus at therning.org
Sun Nov 20 17:44:10 CET 2011
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:57:04PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
> Hi Vesa,
> > I've found out a little late that the 7.2 series is supposedly some sort
> > of a "technology preview" branch. While I think it's totally
> > irresponsible and moronic for the GHC devs to release a point release
> > that's not supposed to be widely used [...].
> actually, GHC 7.2.x is quite stable and it's perfectly alright to use it in
> production. It's been dubbed a "technology preview" because the compiler
> breaks backwards compatibility in ways that require library authors to
> update their code. Those who don't want to deal with that situation ought to
> stick to 7.0.4. However, those incompatibilities are not going to disappear
> by themselves. The 7.4.x release is not going to be different in that
> > We'll have to think about if we really want 7.2 or do we wait for 7.4.
> It comes down to the question: are you willing to patch lots of packages to
> fix compilation? If you don't want to do that, then you'll be stuck with
> 7.0.4 for quite some time. If you don't mind patching packages to fix
> compilation, then updating to 7.2.2 right now is a fine choice.
I'm under the impression that there already are rather a lot of
packages that are updated to deal with changes in 7.2. I don't have
any numbers on that though, are there any such numbers ready
available? If so they could offer a good indication of the amount of
work that an upgrade would require.
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: magnus at therning.org jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
-- Alan Kay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-haskell