[arch-haskell] Dropping (most of) AUR?

[Bernardo Barros]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Magnus Therning
> Any thoughts or comments on this?
>

But there is also cases like qtHaskell that are not straightforward to
build by hand, and it is not in hackage. That should have a [aur] if
not present in [haskell]

In most cases since cabal does a better job, [aur] packages should be
strongly discouraged.