[arch-haskell] State of Affairs: Summarizing 83 days worth of experience
nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com
Wed Jan 12 14:19:52 CET 2011
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:02:09 +0000, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 00:28, Nicolas Pouillard
> <nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:27:54 +0100, Peter Simons <simons at cryp.to> wrote:
> > Hi Peter and others,
> > While I didn't post much on this list I try to carefully follow the evolution
> > since I heavily needs to have a working/"well packaged" environment for
> > Haskell in ArchLinux. I'm in the situation where in order to easily maintain
> > multiple machines I have a personal binary repository for non-official
> > packages that I use from others sources like AUR. Recently I switched from
> > AUR to HABS for my needs in Haskell packages , with great success. I don't
> > (yet) use much of the ArchHaskell tools (except cabal2arch) and rely on some
> > simple shell scripts I already have for my non-haskell packages.
> > So while I cannot guarantee any time to spend on HABS, I would glad to contribute
> > from time to time. I have a fork on github.
> Great. Let us know if you are happy to file pull requests or would
> prefer commit access.
Having commit access would be better, then I will either directly push to master
the changes I'm confident with. And push to another branch the other changes. In
particular I like to have a branch which can goes at the "speed" I want.
More information about the arch-haskell