[arch-haskell] Re: [extra] haskell-parallel

Peter Simons simons at cryp.to
Thu Nov 11 10:20:58 EST 2010

Hi Magnus,

 > http://linode3.kiwilight.com/~magnus.therning/archhaskell/x86_64/

I completely agree that the naming scheme is sound. I don't see, however,
how other packages are going to use it. Could you show us a concrete
example, please? What does a package like, say haskell-pandoc, depend on?

Take care,

More information about the arch-haskell mailing list