[arch-haskell] Hackage support in bauerbill & follow-up on
weihu at cs.virginia.edu
Thu Feb 11 17:23:41 EST 2010
Where can I find your awesome work? I was only able to find the
release, not the development repository.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> I've added preliminary support for Hackage to Bauerbill. The following
> now work:
> "bauerbill -S --hackage [pkgs]" : build [pkgs] directly from Hackage*
> "bauerbill -Si --hackage [pkgs]" : look up information about [pkgs]
> "bauerbill -Ss --hackage [args]" : search for [args]
> "bauerbill -Qu --hackage" : list upgradable Hackage packages
> * with dependency resolution and build dependency tracking and removal
> I've only run a few simple tests so far and I haven't announced this on
> my site or on the forum yet. I'm waiting because I still have some
> issues with cabal2arch which I hope can be solved before I push ahead
> (see below, although I suppose what follows mostly concerns Don).
> Btw, for now at least, if you enable AUR support as well (--aur) then
> AUR packages take precedence over Hackage packages. The reasoning is
> that AUR packages are more likely to be consistent as they're managed
> by arch-haskell and thus have some human oversight. This may change
> later if it's deemed move useful to give precedence to Hackage when
> both are enabled.
> Feedback and bug reports are always welcome.
> I've updated to the latest version of cabal2arch and I've noticed that
> most of the clutter is gone. I appreciate the changes and consider
> them to be a great improvement, but it still creates an archive of the
> build directory which I neither need nor want.
> I would like to make the following suggestions:
> *) add an option to create the archive of the build directory and
> suppress it by default so that cabal2arch only create the build dir
> with the PKGBUILD and install file when run with no options
> *) add an option to create the PKGBUILD and install file in the current
> working directory, and create nothing else
> *) enable batching of multiple cabal files, so that it can accept
> multiple URLs and paths on the command line (including paths to
> directories which contain multiple cabal files)
> I've also noticed that it downloads source files from Hackage. Is that
> just to get the checksums for the archive? If so, it seems rather
> wasteful. Would it not be possible to provide that information in the
> cabal file or via a web API on Hackage?
> If it is not possible to create the PKGBUILD without the source
> archive, please add an option to first check if the source archive
> exists in the build directory and mirror it if it doesn't. This would
> prevent redundant downloads when building packages (which saves time
> and bandwidth for all involved). Bauerbill in particular would benefit
> from this by being able to handle the downloads itself (e.g. in
> parallel). It could also preserve them between build sessions and
> mirror them to only update when necessary.
> Apropos the availability of information from Hackage, the Hackage
> backend of Bauerbill currently uses the log and pkg-list.html
> (in /packages/archives/) to create a plain-text database of all packages
> on Hackage. You can view the "database" file created by bauerbill
> (/tmp/bauerbill/hackage/hackage_db by default). This file is smaller
> than both the log and pkg-list.html and follows the line format
> <name> <version> <category> <type>: <synopsis>
> Would it be possible to generate this file directly on Hackage? Again,
> this would save bandwidth and it would also enable control over the
> versions built by Bauerbill. Currently it tracks the latest versions by
> simple parsing of the log. If the database file were instead provided
> then it would use whichever versions it contained. This would make it
> possible to specify which versions should be built. I don't know if
> this would be an issue but version compatibility does seem to come up
> quite often.
> Of course even if it isn't an issue, it would still be beneficial to
> provide such a plain-text file which applications such as Bauerbill
> could use.
> One final niggle: cabal2arch doesn't understand relative paths to
> parent directories, e.g. "../cabal/foo.cabal".
> Sorry for the long message with several suggestions/requests. I hope
> they're considered reasonable and not too difficult to implement. I
> would particularly appreciate the option to use local source files to
> avoid redundant downloads and the option to suppress creation of the
> build dir archive. Many thanks if you can do this.
> p.s. Would it be useful to be able to rebuild all Hackage packages with
> a simple command? If cabal2arch placed Hackage packages in a group, I
> could easily add a "--rebuild-group" option to Bauerbill. I'm asking
> because I don't actually know if this would be useful
> arch-haskell mailing list
> arch-haskell at haskell.org
More information about the arch-haskell