<html><head></head><body>Thanks, and sorry about that.<div style='white-space: pre-wrap'><br>Sent from my phone with K-9 Mail.</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 April 2022 15:29:28 UTC, Tom Ellis <tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2017@jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre dir="auto" class="k9mail">For reference: <a href="https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/47#issuecomment-1055634151">https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/47#issuecomment-1055634151</a><br><br>On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 11:00:32AM -0400, David Feuer wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Yes, this is a known issue and the default is being removed.<br><br>On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 10:54 AM Keith <keith.wygant@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">The default `bitraverse` implementation should be removed.<br><br>The default `bitraverse` is<br>`bitraverse f g = bisequenceA . bimap f g`.<br><br>But `bisequenceA` is an alias of `bisequence`, which in turn is<br>`bitraverse id id`. Neither `bisequence` nor `bisequenceA` is a<br>Bitraversable method, so they can't have alternative definitions.<br><br>Sorry if this has already been mentioned.<br></blockquote></blockquote><hr>Libraries mailing list<br>Libraries@haskell.org<br><a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>