<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, at 2:44 PM, Bertram Felgenhauer via Libraries wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style=""><div>In any case I think that any change to the library proposal process<br></div><div>should cater to all three types of stakeholders (and possibly others<br></div><div>I have failed to think of). In its current form, I believe<br></div><div><br></div><div> <a href="https://github.com/haskell-core/core-libraries-proposals">https://github.com/haskell-core/core-libraries-proposals</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>fails to do that for observers.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Could you explain why this fails? I watch the ghc-proposals GitHub project and get notified of all comments, so feel as an observer my needs are well catered for. Furthermore, having each proposal be a PR can let me see how a discussion is factored back in to the proposal, as comments become a diff.<br></div><div><br></div><div>What do you feel a ML has that GitHub + watching does not have?</div></body></html>