<div dir="ltr">Agreed!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:13 PM David Feuer <<a href="mailto:david.feuer@gmail.com">david.feuer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">A PR to add the instance for sequences would be accepted promptly.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 3, 2018, 12:51 PM lennart spitzner <<a href="mailto:hexagoxel@hexagoxel.de" target="_blank">hexagoxel@hexagoxel.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
While the impact seems low, some relatively trivial MonadFail instances seem to be missing still, including: Option, First, Last, Proxy, WrappedMonad. Also the non-base containers:Seq. These were not specifically discussed either [1].<br>
<br>
Thoughts? Any other things that are still overlooked?<br>
<br>
<br>
-- lennart<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Discussion" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/Proposals/MonadFail#Discussion</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org" target="_blank">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</blockquote></div>