<div dir="ltr">Let's add <&> to Data.Functor then, as there is a reasonably clear consensus and it already sees fairly wide-spread use.<div><br><div>I think we should leave ffor to another day and a separate explicit request / discussion, unless someone else on the CLC really wants to pipe up strongly in favor of adding it today.<br><div><br></div><div>Adding the CLC to the distribution list to hammer out that detail.</div><div><br></div><div>-Edward</div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Siddhanathan Shanmugam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siddhanathan+eml@gmail.com" target="_blank">siddhanathan+eml@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">There hasn't been any activity in this thread for two weeks. Summary of the discussion so far:<div><br></div><div>+4 in favor</div><div>+1 weakly in favor</div><div>-1 for not being accompanied by ffor</div><div><br></div><div>I'll let the committee take over.</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Elliot Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eacameron@gmail.com" target="_blank">eacameron@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">Heh, I suppose that doesn't help my case much, does it? I "derived" the name for my own uses many times prior to seeing it elsewhere (most notably Reflex: <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex/docs/Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell<wbr>.org/package/reflex/docs/<wbr>Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor</a>). Like I said, the name "ffor" isn't wildly important IMO. I don't want to start the "fmap should be map" debate all over again either.</div></div><div class="m_-6730866501478907632HOEnZb"><div class="m_-6730866501478907632h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, John Wiegley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnw@newartisans.com" target="_blank">johnw@newartisans.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">>>>>> "EC" == Elliot Cameron <<a href="mailto:eacameron@gmail.com" target="_blank">eacameron@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
EC> FWIW, I'm less concerned about the precise name of ffor, although it seems<br>
EC> sad to to lose the obvious correlation with fmap.<br>
<br>
Ah, it wasn't until you said that that I understood why "ffor", but now it<br>
makes some sense. :)<br>
<div class="m_-6730866501478907632m_-3314948361191985356HOEnZb"><div class="m_-6730866501478907632m_-3314948361191985356h5"><br>
--<br>
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F<br>
<a href="http://newartisans.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://newartisans.com</a> 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br></div></div><span class="">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org" target="_blank">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bi<wbr>n/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>