Discussion: should we make liftA2 an Applicative method?
Bardur Arantsson
spam at scientician.net
Sun Jan 15 20:00:47 UTC 2017
Previous message:
Discussion: should we make liftA2 an Applicative method?
Next message:
Derived Functor instance for void types
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 2017-01-14 22:49, David Feuer wrote: >
Right now, we define
>
+1
Previous message:
Discussion: should we make liftA2 an Applicative method?
Next message:
Derived Functor instance for void types
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Libraries mailing list