bitSize/bitSizeMaybe

Herbert Valerio Riedel hvr at gnu.org
Fri Oct 11 23:15:05 UTC 2013


On 2013-09-18 at 13:56:22 +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:

[...]

> As it stands, the current implementation state is at
>
>  http://git.haskell.org/packages/base.git/commitdiff/cddc9024e67a6d4c01bb190839d0134af8c907e0
>
> Now I have two questions:
>
>  1.) Currently, bitSizeMaybe and bitSize have no default implementation
>      defined. Shall we define mutually recursive default implementations
>      for these two functions to help smooth the transition?
>
>      e.g. in the style (just an example, not an actual proposal) of:
>
>        bitSize = fromJust . bitSizeMaybe
>  
>        bitSizeMaybe = Just . bitSize
>
>
>  2.) As it's probably not to late to easily fix any bikeshedding/naming
>      issues: Shall the naming remain as implemented?

PS: 

  3.) What's the benefit of having the super-class constraint on

        class Bits b => FiniteBits b where
            finiteBitSize :: b -> Int

      ?



More information about the Libraries mailing list