Proposal: splitting the network package

Michael Snoyman michael at snoyman.com
Tue Jan 8 07:34:11 CET 2013


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu at iij.ad.jp> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The network package contains both socket modules and a URI
> module. They are in different level. Since new features are actively
> added to the socket modules, we may want to install a new network
> package even though Haskell Platform includes it. However, the
> Network.URI module depends on Parsec which depends on the text
> package. This sometimes causes dependency hell.
>
> I would like to propose to split the network package into:
> - new network package which contains socket modules only
> - network-uri package which contains Network.URI only
>
> Example implementations are available:
>         https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/network/tree/no-uri
>         https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/network-uri
>
> Note that they keep necessary commit history.
>
> In HP, only "HTTP" and "cgi" depends on "network" and they use
> "Network.URI". They can be compiled by just adding "network-uri" as
> dependency.  Also, "http-conduit" uses "Network.URI". This can also be
> compiled by adding "network-uri".
>
> For more information, please refer to:
>         https://github.com/haskell/network/issues/76
>
> Discussion period: 2 weeks
>
> --Kazu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>

+1. When doing testing on Windows, I've run into this dependency hell
multiple times, and the ultimate solution was just to remove a number of HP
packages from the global database.

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130108/7059991d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Libraries mailing list