Parsec branch (was Re: Bug in Parsec.Token)

[Jean-Philippe Bernardy]

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Antoine Latter <aslatter at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:21 AM, wren ng thornton
> <wren at community.haskell.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'd argue that it's acceptable, at least under this plan:
>>
>> * fork parsec-2.1 as parsec2-2.1
>> * continue to develop parsec2-* (as desired)
>> * deprecate parsec<3 with message to switch to parsec2-*
>> * continue parsec>=3 as parsec-*

Why not use the version numbers 2.* ?

If you cannot do that, then it means the versioning scheme is broken.

Cheers,
JP.