Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage

[Duncan Coutts]

On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 09:58 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:

> >>    * remove html? (we have xhtml)
> >
> > On the other hand xhtml seems to be going out of fashion.
> 
> Right, but I think xhtml has had a lot more attention over the years. 
> Perhaps it should have the option to produce HTML - after all if you 
> drop the XML header you're nearly there.

That sounds like a good idea. It would also make it a lot easier for
programs to switch between formats.

> Haddock has its own local copy of html.  I wonder why that is...

Purge it and find out :-)

Duncan