From carter.schonwald at gmail.com  Tue Nov  7 01:22:31 2017
From: carter.schonwald at gmail.com (Carter Schonwald)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 20:22:31 -0500
Subject: Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?
In-Reply-To: <m2zi87fkoh.fsf@newartisans.com>
References: <CAHYVw0wGqsFqovjdSA4k=P_GNQjnr3PGLNk_H68ecsUoAo4cmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFsArvFwN_HeTpoYUHm0WTt94LO3kfuUL_i9tYwy+jRK0S3Pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jUvnf=GkKbSTvV9ZGL7jO8TRgDXG45_dwMnLqF=oogWkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <871sni1ibv.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jU7dMeoQ3hS-2L5TqTw321SdEty-uzWk-F0pXbwm+Lf_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jUVy8RZUYHrT3cefSQbrcBo8yENUMzwoiMop72r2fA8wQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y3poat2f.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
 <17621677-A98C-4010-8140-508B992219D7@swierstra.net>
 <m2zi87fkoh.fsf@newartisans.com>
Message-ID: <CAHYVw0wnwg-cqCKP3S81uv-_D=KNhqS_6-vhfhp3fUgjhv6KpA@mail.gmail.com>

agreed

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, John Wiegley <johnw at newartisans.com>
wrote:

> >>>>> "DS" == Doaitse Swierstra <doaitse at swierstra.net> writes:
>
> SD> The good thing about laTeX is that out of all the candidates it is the
> SD> most likely one to still work 40 years from now,
>
> +1 from me for LaTeX as well.
>
> --
> John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20171106/d6a55c0e/attachment.html>

From Henrik.Nilsson at nottingham.ac.uk  Tue Nov  7 09:35:52 2017
From: Henrik.Nilsson at nottingham.ac.uk (Henrik Nilsson)
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 09:35:52 +0000
Subject: Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?
In-Reply-To: <CAHYVw0wnwg-cqCKP3S81uv-_D=KNhqS_6-vhfhp3fUgjhv6KpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHYVw0wGqsFqovjdSA4k=P_GNQjnr3PGLNk_H68ecsUoAo4cmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFsArvFwN_HeTpoYUHm0WTt94LO3kfuUL_i9tYwy+jRK0S3Pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jUvnf=GkKbSTvV9ZGL7jO8TRgDXG45_dwMnLqF=oogWkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <871sni1ibv.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jU7dMeoQ3hS-2L5TqTw321SdEty-uzWk-F0pXbwm+Lf_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-J8jUVy8RZUYHrT3cefSQbrcBo8yENUMzwoiMop72r2fA8wQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y3poat2f.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
 <17621677-A98C-4010-8140-508B992219D7@swierstra.net>
 <m2zi87fkoh.fsf@newartisans.com>
 <CAHYVw0wnwg-cqCKP3S81uv-_D=KNhqS_6-vhfhp3fUgjhv6KpA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5A017E78.20300@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>

Yes, I see no benefits moving from LaTeX. So remain LaTeX.

/Henrik




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


From doug at cs.dartmouth.edu  Tue Nov  7 15:00:55 2017
From: doug at cs.dartmouth.edu (Doug McIlroy)
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:00:55 -0500
Subject: Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?
Message-ID: <201711071500.vA7F0ton013955@coolidge.cs.Dartmouth.EDU>

> The good thing about laTeX is that out of all the candidates it is the
> most likely one to still work 40 years from now,

If past results are any measure of future performance, the only
candidate with demonstrated 40-year longevity is troff/groff :)

Doug McIlroy