From carter.schonwald at gmail.com Fri Aug 25 22:48:26 2017 From: carter.schonwald at gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:48:26 +0000 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? Message-ID: I'll be this time! :) We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. There's still the valid and important need of then taking the discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnw at newartisans.com Fri Aug 25 23:09:31 2017 From: johnw at newartisans.com (John Wiegley) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:09:31 -0700 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: (Carter Schonwald's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:48:26 +0000") References: Message-ID: >>>>> "CS" == Carter Schonwald writes: CS> I'll be this time! :) CS> We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. I will be there as well. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 From Henrik.Nilsson at nottingham.ac.uk Sat Aug 26 11:14:43 2017 From: Henrik.Nilsson at nottingham.ac.uk (Henrik Nilsson) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 12:14:43 +0100 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <59A15823.3020401@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk> I will attend ICFP and the Haskell symposium. Meeting up is a very good idea! Best, /Henrik This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. From blamario at ciktel.net Sat Aug 26 16:55:27 2017 From: blamario at ciktel.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Mario_Bla=c5=beevi=c4=87?=) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 12:55:27 -0400 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <30a5ee1d-ac9f-0571-97e7-2c00d29ba041@ciktel.net> On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote: > I'll be this time! :) > > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. > > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something, anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the standard. From carter.schonwald at gmail.com Sat Aug 26 22:30:21 2017 From: carter.schonwald at gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 22:30:21 +0000 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: <30a5ee1d-ac9f-0571-97e7-2c00d29ba041@ciktel.net> References: <30a5ee1d-ac9f-0571-97e7-2c00d29ba041@ciktel.net> Message-ID: Agreed. Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool for coms. On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM Mario Blažević wrote: > On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote: > > I'll be this time! :) > > > > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. > > > > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. > > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the > > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make > > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for > > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 > > I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my > feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something, > anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real > danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the > standard. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime at haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carter.schonwald at gmail.com Sat Aug 26 22:30:50 2017 From: carter.schonwald at gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 22:30:50 +0000 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: References: <30a5ee1d-ac9f-0571-97e7-2c00d29ba041@ciktel.net> Message-ID: Either way, see y'all in oxford On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM Carter Schonwald wrote: > Agreed. Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub > flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool > for coms. > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM Mario Blažević > wrote: > >> On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote: >> > I'll be this time! :) >> > >> > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. >> > >> > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. >> > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the >> > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make >> > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for >> > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 >> >> I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my >> feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something, >> anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real >> danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the >> standard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-prime mailing list >> Haskell-prime at haskell.org >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From J.Hage at uu.nl Tue Aug 29 05:50:20 2017 From: J.Hage at uu.nl (Jurriaan Hage) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:50:20 +1000 Subject: Whose gonna be at icfp? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I won’t be there. :-( Jur > On 26Aug, 2017, at 08:48, Carter Schonwald wrote: > > I'll be this time! :) > > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp. > > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion. There's still the valid and important need of then taking the discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020 > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime at haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime