<html><head></head><body><div><div><div style="display: none; border: 0px; width: 0px; height: 0px; overflow: hidden; visibility: hidden;"><img src="https://r.superhuman.com/RgfC7vHcJSbyKv_5ZyvxhglFPmA5wlbLfBIRG4M7BsqI9XK5WdnH78Gj8ZJ4vYjBsMl5MN9S27XMzMm0SkfY2QQtE2v-YBdPkq9pWSmOe1cfDqej9NCT5y0903DIKuTXgufxXmAlfI-BvlhYCvgtJC97QZ8TZ9jvTObS8KNweRa7tUtlzmlmsPqpJRA.gif" alt=" " width="1" height="0" style="display: none; border: 0px; width: 0px; height: 0px; overflow: hidden; visibility: hidden;"/><!-- --></div><div><div>Hi Everyone,<br/></div><div><br/></div><div>I'm pleased to announce that we've released a new version of `base64-bytestring` that now supports `bytestring-0.11` in a backwards-compatible manner. <br/></div><div><br/></div><div>I'd also like to make an RFC: we are thinking that we will drop support for GHC versions <7.10 in future releases of the project. The earliest release in which this can be expected will be around 6 months from now. The dev burden for supporting back to 7.0 is high, and unless someone screams in protest, the value does not seem to be there. <br/></div><div><br/></div><div>I'd like to get your thoughts on this. <br/></div><div><br/></div><div>Cheers,<br/></div><div>Emily</div></div><br/><div class="gmail_signature"></div></div></div></body></html>