<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.10570.1001"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=428005802-10022018><FONT face=Calibri><FONT
color=#000080><SPAN class=827335802-10022018>P</SPAN>urescript is very close to
Haskell<SPAN class=827335802-10022018>, check it
out!</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV><BR>
<DIV lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> Dennis Raddle
[mailto:dennis.raddle@gmail.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 09, 2018 9:54
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Gregory Popovitch<BR><B>Cc:</B> haskell-cafe<BR><B>Subject:</B>
Re: [Haskell-cafe] web framework<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Thanks, but what do you think the learning curve will be on
PureScript? How similar to Haskell is it?
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I want to balance some factors here. As my initial goal is rapid
prototyping and experimentation, I'd like to use a language I already know well,
in other words Haskell. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>But of course even with a familiar language, I'm going into a quite
unfamiliar situation (web programming) and there is a learning curve with
that. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>It may be that a language other than Haskell, i.e. PureScript, although
requiring a learning curve, would be more suited to my app's needs and thus save
me grief. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I don't know.</DIV>
<DIV>Dennis</DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>