<p dir="ltr">You're right, I think. I wasn't being very scientific with my investigation. Though as mentioned, -fno-full-laziness seems like a bit of a sledgehammer.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 18 Dec 2015 18:54, "Tom Ellis" <<a href="mailto:tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk">tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:43:10PM +0000, David Turner wrote:<br>
> Some combination of dummy arguments, NOINLINE and -fno-full-laziness did<br>
> indeed prevent it from sharing but this definitely seemed unsatisfactory.<br>
> Particularly that -fno-full-laziness applies to the whole module which<br>
> feels a bit heavyweight.<br>
<br>
I would be very surprised if -fno-full-laziness did not fix the issue on its<br>
own.  Do you have a simple example which I can reproduce myself that shows<br>
that it doesn't?<br>
<br>
Tom<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</blockquote></div>