<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Tom Ellis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk" target="_blank">tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":2nu" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">No, not at all.  I'm making a much stronger claim than that.  I'm claiming<br>
the functionality provided by newtype is completely subsumed by that<br>
provided by data.</div></blockquote></div><br>When did `data` start guaranteeing that the representation of a single constructor, strict `data' wrapper around another type is exactly the same as the wrapped type?<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a>                                  <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>