[Haskell-cafe] Comments from OCaml Hacker Brian Hurt

[Thomas DuBuisson]

> How does forcing them to learn proposed terminology such as `Appendable'
> help here?  Learners of Haskell do still need to learn what the new word
> means.

The contention is that 'Appendable' is an intuitive naming that people
will already have a rudimentary grasp of.  This as opposed to Monoid,
which absolutely requires looking up for the average coder.