[Haskell-cafe] Aren't type system extensions fun? [Further analysis]

[Ryan Ingram]

On 5/27/08, Darrin Thompson <darrinth at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <a.biurvOir4 at asuhan.com> wrote:
> > What we want is the callEE to choose x_t since callEE needs to
> > instantiate x_t to Char and Bool. What we want is
> >  (x_t -> x -> x) -> (Char, Bool).
> > But that's just
> >  (forall x. x -> x) -> (Char, Bool).

> Nice. That's the first time any of this really made sense to me. Is it
> possible to construct valid argument for that function?

Yes, it's easy, especially since there is only one total function of
that type: id

  -- ryan