[Haskell-cafe] Cyclic Inclusions

[ajb at spamcop.net]

G'day all.

Quoting "C.M.Brown" <cmb21 at kent.ac.uk>:

> But isn't this exactly the point I was trying to make!? The whole point,
> to me, in functional programming, is that we shouldn't have to worry about
> the underlying implementation.

It is not exposing an underlying implementation detail to mandate that
modules should have well-defined interfaces.  If anything, it's
enforcing good programming practice.

Cheers,
Andrew Bromage