[Haskell-cafe] Announce: Monad Transformer Tutorial

[Tomasz Zielonka]

An errata for my email:

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
> No let's get to nitpicking ;-)

should be

 Now let's get to nitpicking ;-)

> * page 8, at about 85%: you say "The state maintained in our example is
>   a simple integer value, but it *can* be any data type we wish". I
>   think it's better to say *could*, because with *can* it could be
>   (mis)understood that in a give State monad use the type of state can
>   change. Also, you are mixing values with types: "simple integer
>   value" vs "any data type".

should be
 
   (mis)understood that in a given State monad the type of state can
   change during the computation. Also, you are mixing values with
   types: "simple integer value" vs "any data type".

Best regards
Tomasz