<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">It sounds like we have enough support here to declare this accepted. I will do so now.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks, all!</div><div class="">Richard<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 10, 2021, at 1:57 AM, Spiwack, Arnaud <<a href="mailto:arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io" class="">arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">It's not a very concrete statement. I'll have to trust you on this.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I guess that if `~` doesn't get special parsing rules then it's an overridable name. This is good. And everything which can simplify the parser is welcome. So let me vote: aye.<br class=""> </div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:16 PM Richard Eisenberg <<a href="mailto:rae@richarde.dev" class="">rae@richarde.dev</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 31, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Spiwack, Arnaud <<a href="mailto:arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io" target="_blank" class="">arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io</a>> wrote:</div><br class=""><div class=""><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none;float:none;display:inline" class="">Those of us who have been involved in the parts of the compiler that are touched here: do you think this is a worthwhile simplification?</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Yes, I think so. Every special widget in the language takes custom support, and this removes one. The implementation of `~` will still be somewhat special, but there's no reason the parsing, etc., needs to be.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Richard</div></div></blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>