<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
.MsoPapDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:6.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">This is about #281 visible dependent quantification.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Our role is to accept, reject, or push back to the author for revision. We should do so in a timely way.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">If I were the shepherd I’d be asking the author “Do you want to revise the proposal at all in the light of all the discussion, or do you want the committee to decide yay/nay based on the proposal
as it is now?” <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">He might want to revise/discuss a bit. But if he says “please decide on it as-is” then I think you should make a recommendation: accept or reject. (I don’t think the discussion has led to any specific
revisions that we want to see.) <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I sense you would recommend reject. That’s totally fine. Then the rest of us have to make up our minds. We might end up with a more nuanced position like “we are not ready to accept this now,
so if you want a decision now, it’d be no; but feel free to ask the same question again in six months time”.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">If you don’t feel able to be the shepherd, that’s fine too: tell Joachim and he’ll finger someone else!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">But, by hook or by crook, I do think we should do something, not just sit on it. Tom’s nudge is helpful.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Simon<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki@gmail.com>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 March 2021 19:42<br>
<b>To:</b> Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>; ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Status<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
I am being nudged to do something with this proposal, but I am not sure what... Is the rest of the committee OK with moving it back "revisions required", and if so what revisions would we like? <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
I would be quite happy if someone else wanted to shephard this. As I mentioned before, I don't have much interest in DH, so I have not followed the really long discussion related to that, and if and how it might relate to #281. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
My recommendation for the moment would be:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
* This seems like a useful feature independent of DH, so it would be nice to come up with a concise notation to use the feature on its own, without worrying about DH.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
Please let me know what you think, as I am not sure what is the committee's stance on the proposal.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
-Iavor<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm">
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:54 PM Simon Peyton Jones <<a href="mailto:simonpj@microsoft.com">simonpj@microsoft.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">There has been a broad further discussion.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">What we advertise is that, rather that leave a proposal “under committee review”, we will push it back to the author with an invitation to resubmit when the discussion has died
down and they feel ready to submit a proposal, revised in the light of the discussion. That’s different to reject… it means that there is an ongoing debate so it’s not a good time for the committee to make a decision.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><br>
Simon<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> ghc-steering-committee <<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee-bounces@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-steering-committee-bounces@haskell.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Iavor Diatchki<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 18 February 2021 16:47<br>
<b>To:</b> Joachim Breitner <<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" target="_blank">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> ghc-steering-committee <<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Status</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">On #381 I think the idea of visible quantification makes sense every now and then, but I don't like the concrete details of the proposal: the magic lifting of terms to types seems quite
complicated, and using `type` as an explicit herald doesn't look nice. So I don't think it's the right design, and therefore I suggest we reject the proposal.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">I am sure that others would disagree as apparently this is an essential part of dependent Haskell. I have not followed the large discussion that Richard created, as I am not particularly
interested in the design being proposed, so perhaps someone else should champion this.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">Aslo, I am not sure if I am actually on the committee, as I thought my term had expired? That might be more reason for someone else to pick it up.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">-Iavor<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:32 AM Joachim Breitner <<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" target="_blank">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:6.0pt">Dear Committee,<br>
<br>
another status update, because why not.<br>
<br>
A small reminder: These mails have two sections, one that’s a delta<br>
since last status, but below is a summary of all proposals we have to<br>
act on. Please at least scroll through that on each status mail to see<br>
if you are listed, maybe you forgot something (or I made a mistake).<br>
<br>
So here’s the delta since last month.<br>
<br>
* GHC2021 defined! Yay!<br>
<br>
* Bylaws merged! Yay<br>
<br>
* Simon², Iavor, Richard and me had thus their terms expired.<br>
<br>
The Simons, as key members, wanted to continue and were<br>
voted back in.<br>
<br>
The others are now “expiring”, until the next nomination round<br>
concludes. Alejandro is going to run that process.<br>
<br>
* we were asked to review these proposals:<br>
#390: Fine-grained pragmas, Shepherd: Vitaly<br>
<br>
* we have a recommendation from the shepherd about:<br>
#368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators (accept)<br>
<br>
* we have sent the following proposals back to revision<br>
- none -<br>
<br>
* we decided about the following proposals<br>
#313: Delimited continuation primops (accept)<br>
#387: The Char kind (accept)<br>
#368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators (accept)<br>
<br>
We currently have to act on the following 5 proposals, down by 2.<br>
<br>
## Waiting for committee decision<br>
<br>
#381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor<br>
Recommendation was to reject, but discussion went into the more <br>
abstract “whither dependent Haskell”. But what does this mean<br>
for this proposal?<br>
Iavor, can you pick this up again?<br>
<br>
#369: Add sumToTag# primop, Shepherd: Eric<br>
Essentially accepted, waiting for feedback from the author on<br>
final tweaks. Eric, care to nudge the author, or just do it?<br>
<br>
#302: \of, Shepherd: Cale<br>
No new discussion yet. It seems there was some confusion, which<br>
was cleared up by Tom, and Cale said he’ll pick it up now again.<br>
<br>
<br>
## Waiting for Shepherd action<br>
<br>
#367: Clarify primops using unboxed sums, Shepherd: Simon Marlow<br>
Simon said he’d reject it on the Github PR. Still waiting<br>
for the discussion to start on the mailing list.<br>
<br>
#390: Fine-grained pragmas, Shepherd: Vitaly<br>
Still kinda new, but a recommendation would be good soon.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Joachim<br>
-- <br>
Joachim Breitner<br>
<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" target="_blank">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a><br>
<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joachim-breitner.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C0f8040e69348485e5e2808d8e00ed1af%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637505701561371493%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hAny2jNi%2BPKhgMYqiwt4HyNDkvOSFSHKYfYKmrJ3qOk%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering-committee&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C0f8040e69348485e5e2808d8e00ed1af%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637505701561381491%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=U6m9laT7pV9QEuzCyFXY2oZT4RFt2yFhDWuJE7YgIMM%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>