<div dir="ltr"><div>LGTM too. Thanks Richard!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 16:39, Joachim Breitner <<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear Committee,<br>
<br>
after some refinement by some of you on the PR (thanks!), Richard would<br>
like us to vote on the bylaws.<br>
<br>
Please review<br>
<a href="https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/bylaws/committee.rst" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/bylaws/committee.rst</a><br>
and also the other changes of<br>
<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360/files" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360/files</a><br>
<br>
The maybe most prominent change is the introduction of term limits of 3<br>
years for all who are not Simon. This means that Richard, Iavor and me<br>
would, upon acceptance of this proposal, drop out, causing the size of<br>
the committee to drop below 9, thus triggering a call for nominations,<br>
for which we’d be eligible to re-nominiate ourself.<br>
<br>
Please have a closer look again, so that we have ironed out all<br>
wrinkles, and then very soon can vote about these bylaws.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Joachim<br>
<br>
<br>
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2020, 15:00 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
> <br>
> Some time ago, I posted <a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/360</a>, an attempt at crafting bylaws for this committee. Conversation has died down, and so I'd like to have a discussion that will lead to amendments and then eventual acceptance (of something).<br>
> <br>
> I think it's best for this discussion to be right on the PR, not this thread. However, given that this PR is all about how we function, as a committee, I would like to see participation (ideally, agreement!) from everyone here before proceeding, even if it's just a LGTM.<br>
> <br>
> Thanks!<br>
> Richard<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee</a><br>
-- <br>
Joachim Breitner<br>
  <a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" target="_blank">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a><br>
  <a href="http://www.joachim-breitner.de/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.joachim-breitner.de/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>