<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi everyone,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">It sounds as though this change isn’t too controversial, and everyone who has voiced an opinion has given some level of agreement. If there are no other thoughts, Joachim, shall I declare this proposal accepted on the thread?</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Thanks,</div>
<div class="">Tom</div>
<div class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 4 Nov 2020, at 15:22, Tom Harding <<a href="mailto:tomjharding@live.co.uk" class="">tomjharding@live.co.uk</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi all,<br class="">
<br class="">
I’d like to open committee discussion for <b class="">DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access</b>. Other committee members have already commented, and I’ll say I’m strongly in favour of this proposal. I definitely see the suggestion here as “tidying
up” an unintuitive - perhaps even counterintuitive - behaviour.
<div class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366" class="">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366</a>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Thanks,</div>
<div class="">Tom</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
PS. Sorry for my recent absence; I think it has been a very strange few months for all us!<br class="">
<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">On 2 Nov 2020, at 09:08, Joachim Breitner <<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" class="">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
Dear Committee,<br class="">
<br class="">
this is your secretary speaking:<br class="">
<br class="">
DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access<br class="">
was proposed by Adam Gundry<br class="">
<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366" class="">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366</a><br class="">
<a href="https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/no-ambiguous-selectors/proposals/0000-no-ambiguous-field-access.rst" class="">https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/no-ambiguous-selectors/proposals/0000-no-ambiguous-field-access.rst</a><br class="">
<br class="">
I’ll propose Tom Harding as the shepherd.<br class="">
<br class="">
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in <br class="">
<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process" class="">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process</a><br class="">
<br class="">
Thanks,<br class="">
Joachim<br class="">
-- <br class="">
Joachim Breitner<br class="">
<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" class="">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a><br class="">
<a href="http://www.joachim-breitner.de/" class="">http://www.joachim-breitner.de/</a><br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" class="">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" class="">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee</a><br class="">
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org" class="">ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org</a><br class="">
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>