<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi committee,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I am the shepherd for #320, about a tweak to the handling of associated-type defaults in hs-boot and signature files. I recommend acceptance.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Proposal: <a href="https://github.com/obsidiansystems/ghc-proposals/blob/signature-type-instances/proposals/0000-signature-instances.md" class="">https://github.com/obsidiansystems/ghc-proposals/blob/signature-type-instances/proposals/0000-signature-instances.md</a></div><div class="">Recommendation (in GitHub thread): <a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/320#issuecomment-623346043" class="">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/320#issuecomment-623346043</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As stated in our published process (<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process" class="">https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process</a>), technical conversation should go on the GitHub thread, while evaluative comments can go on this thread in the mailing list.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I expect this will be boring and uncontroversial to many of us. I will accept this in one week unless debate has sprung up.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks!</div><div class="">Richard</div></body></html>