<div dir="ltr">I thought the Levity Polymorphism one (i.e, make the representation of unboxed tuples more fine grained) is a fairly straight one, so perhaps we should start with it?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Christopher Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cma@bitemyapp.com" target="_blank">cma@bitemyapp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">What's the most ready for discussion or implementation in your estimation?<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Joachim Breitner<br>
<<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> good to have a mailing list, thanks to whoever set it up.<br>
><br>
> I would like to see us warming up by handling a first proposal before<br>
> all of us forget that we are on this committee. Which should we get<br>
> started on?<br>
><br>
> There are two that have the “Pending review” label: Levity Polymorphism<br>
> and OverloadedRecordFields<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/labels/Pending%20committee%20review" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc-<wbr>proposals/ghc-proposals/<wbr>labels/Pending%20committee%<wbr>20review</a><br>
> According to our process documents, this label setting should have<br>
> already triggered our part of the process!<br>
><br>
> We could also look for proposals that have not been updated in a while<br>
> (you can sort by that in the issue list) for example<br>
> * Optional tuple parenthesization <<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/19" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc-<wbr>proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/<wbr>19</a>><br>
> * Stack pointer stuff <<a href="https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/17" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc-<wbr>proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/<wbr>17</a>><br>
> and others.<br>
> I pinged a few random old proposals and asked them to maybe move<br>
> forward (or abandon).<br>
><br>
> Greetings,<br>
> Joachim<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner<br>
>   <a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a> • <a href="https://www.joachim-breitner.de/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.joachim-breitner.<wbr>de/</a><br>
>   XMPP: <a href="mailto:nomeata@joachim-breitner.de">nomeata@joachim-breitner.de</a> • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F<br>
>   Debian Developer: <a href="mailto:nomeata@debian.org">nomeata@debian.org</a><br>
</div></div>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org">ghc-steering-committee@<wbr>haskell.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-<wbr>steering-committee</a><br>
><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Chris Allen<br>
Currently working on <a href="http://haskellbook.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://haskellbook.com</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org">ghc-steering-committee@<wbr>haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-<wbr>steering-committee</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>