[ghc-steering-committee] committee deliberation discussions

[Spiwack, Arnaud]

The steering committee mailing list is actually open to everybody to post.
So on the technical side, I don't see a problem. On the social side,
though, I see more difficulties. It will tend to create more barrier of
entries for authors to make successful proposal, for instance (one more
thing to get subscribed to, I should also mention that I've noticed that
people in their twenties tend to be pretty uncomfortable with mailing
lists). So I think a hybrid discussion where the committee speaks among
themselves, then come back to the author, is probably the best option. It
does put some more work for the shepherd which needs to organise the back
and forth. But hopefully not too much.

Other than that, I agree with everything Richard says and proposes. I'll
add one argument: there is no good reason why the public discussion on a
proposal should stop just because the committee is having a chinwag about
it.

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:31 PM Richard Eisenberg <rae at richarde.dev> wrote:

>
>
> On Jul 17, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Sandy Maguire <sandy at sandymaguire.me> wrote:
>
> Could we grant proposal authors access to the mailing list during the
> discussion period?
>
>
> I'm not sure how technically easy or hard this would be. We could always
> accept emails from authors on a case-by-case basis, simply by changing the
> mailman settings.
>
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20190718/4c27547c/attachment.html>