[ghc-steering-committee] GHC proposals

[Simon Peyton Jones]

  *   I agree with “hitting master”.
  *   The “implemented status does not need to be 100% up to date; but it would be good to explain how to ask for a proposal to be moved from “accepted” to “implemented”.
  *   There should be a link in the “timeline” list on https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals, so that people can find the list. Perhaps “6. Later, someone may implement the proposal.  We count it as “implemented” when it hits the GHC mater banch” <link>

THanks!

Simon

From: Vitaly Bragilevsky <bravit111 at gmail.com>
Sent: 03 December 2018 16:41
To: Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
Cc: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>; ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
Subject: Re: GHC proposals

Hi,

I've fixed "under discussion" list and added "Non-proposal" label.

I am volunteering to keep track of the implemented proposals with  "Implemented" label. I think hitting master is the right time to consider the proposal implemented, are there other ideas on that?

Vitaly

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:24 AM Vitaly Bragilevsky <bravit111 at gmail.com<mailto:bravit111 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Vitaly, how about we delete the Proposal tag, and maybe mark non-
proposals with a tag (maybe with a grey or dull color). Given that most
pull requests are proposals, let’s mark the exceptions instead!

Ok, I'll do that. Sorry for messing things up, I wanted to count all proposals but took a longer road.

Vitaly
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20181203/f6ecae72/attachment.html>