[ghc-steering-committee] Where should we discuss?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 01.03.2017, 09:59 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
> What’s the protocol?  Should committee discussion take place by
> default on the proposal thread itself, with exceptional out-of-band
> private discussion on the mailing list?  Or by-default private on the
> mailing list?

I guess we have not had a serious discussion yet, so this part of the
process still needs to be fleshed out.

One can argue both ways. I don’t really care either way. Why don’t we
just see what people prefer to do naturally for a while, and maybe only
then document what we end up doing?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170301/23af4cfb/attachment.sig>