[ghc-steering-committee] [ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals] Lazy unboxed tuples / warn on unbanged strict patterns (#35)

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 27.01.2017, 09:16 -0500 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
> > On Jan 27, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.
> > com> wrote:
> > 
> > OK.  I propose that we change this.  Remove the four-week
> > language.  Instead:
> > 
> > * At any time the author of a proposal can transition from
> > "Discussion" to
> >  "Decision", by changing the status of the proposal [link to
> > explain how],
> >  and by sending email to the committee to signal the change.
> > 
> >  The author should do this only when there has been adequate
> > opportunity
> >  for the community to respond to the proposal.  It would be unusual
> >  to consider adequate any period less than four weeks from the last
> >  substantial change to the proposal.  But this is not a hard and
> > fast
> >  rule.  It's the intent that matters.
> > 
> > * Any proposal in "Discussion" that has had no input for more than
> > four weeks
> >  may be moved "Dormant" status (by anyone).  The goal here is
> > simply to keep manageable
> >  the list of proposals that are being actively worked on.  The
> > author
> >  is free to resurrect it to "Discussion" status.
> 
> +1

+1
-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170127/8e32a267/attachment.sig>