[ghc-steering-committee] Please review: UNPACK on function arguments, Shepherd: Simon Marlow

[Joachim Breitner]

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/46
was brought before the committee. There was almost no discussion, and
this is quite niche. 

I propose Simon Marlow as the Shepherd, given that he at least looked
at it once, and his expertise in performance and RTS stuff.

Simon, please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
you.



FYI, the oher proposals under discussion at the moment are:

Constructor Synonyms and Pattern Synonym Signatures
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/41
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/42
Shepherd: Chris Allen
Proposal: Accept 41, reject 42.
Status: Consensus is reached. Chris should summarize the verdict and
assign the labels appropriately.

Eval class
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
Shepherd: Richard
Status: This came back after being sent to the author for revision.
I guess at this point Richard should make a new decision suggestion.

instance force
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/23
Shepherd: Manuel
Status: Awaiting shepherd recommendation.

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170413/34edacee/attachment.sig>