<div dir="auto">Which sounds like we have agreed on 9.0?<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Alan</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, 00:28 Ben Gamari, <<a href="mailto:ben@smart-cactus.org">ben@smart-cactus.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Artem Pelenitsyn <<a href="mailto:a.pelenitsyn@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">a.pelenitsyn@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> Does Quick Look still have chances to make it into the next release?<br>
> It'd be fascinating if the major version bump got both linear and<br>
> impredicative types!<br>
><br>
I'm afraid not. Quick Look will need to wait for 9.2.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
- Ben<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-devs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">ghc-devs@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs</a><br>
</blockquote></div>