<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>just came here to resurrect the thread and point out that nofib currently isn't really run in parallel: <a href="https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15976#ticket">https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15976#ticket</a></div><div>Also it's unclear to me how that would be possible without rewriting the whole benchmark harness in Python or Haskell, because make parallelism would probably interleave outputs of different rules, giving nofib-analyse a hard time.</div><div><br></div><div>Greetings<br>Sebastian</div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Am Mo., 30. Okt. 2017 um 00:14 Uhr schrieb Joachim Breitner <<a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
Am Sonntag, den 29.10.2017, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Graf:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> <br>
> just wanted to throw in the idea of parallelising the benchmark suite<br>
> (hurts to even write that, but cachegrind) to speed up the build, if<br>
> ever need be.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/nomeata/gipeda/blob/master/ghc/run-speed.sh#L143" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/nomeata/gipeda/blob/master/ghc/run-speed.sh#L143</a><br>
<br>
good idea indeed – I’ve been doing that since I started running<br>
cachegrind ;-)<br>
<br>
<br>
Joachim<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Joachim Breitner<br>
  <a href="mailto:mail@joachim-breitner.de" target="_blank">mail@joachim-breitner.de</a><br>
  <a href="http://www.joachim-breitner.de/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.joachim-breitner.de/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-devs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org" target="_blank">ghc-devs@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs</a><br>
</blockquote></div>