<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>Sorry; wasn't thinking straight!</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757">David Feuer</div><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757">Well-Typed, LLP</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "Boespflug, Mathieu" <m@tweag.io> </div><div>Date: 9/28/17 3:56 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: David Feuer <david@well-typed.com> </div><div>Cc: ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: Including libffi as a submodule </div><div><br></div></div>Aren't we talking about the C project here? https://sourceware.org/libffi/<br>--<br>Mathieu Boespflug<br>Founder at http://tweag.io.<br><br><br>On 28 September 2017 at 06:27, David Feuer <david@well-typed.com> wrote:<br>> On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 9:38:11 PM EDT Ben Gamari wrote:<br>><br>>> Numerous attempts have<br>>> been made to get the libffi maintainers to cut a new release but sadly<br>>> no progress has been made in over six months of trying.<br>><br>> Has anyone followed the process described in the somewhat poorly named<br>> https://wiki.haskell.org/Taking_over_a_package to try to add one or more<br>> maintainers upstream? If the current maintainer(s) object to that, would it make<br>> sense to produce a proper fork on Hackage?<br>><br>> David<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> ghc-devs mailing list<br>> ghc-devs@haskell.org<br>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<br><br></body></html>