<p dir="ltr">"While were in there", it occurred to me that one `coerce` per constructor argument ideally ought to suffice.</p>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Aug 15, 2016, 07:17 GHC <<a href="mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org">ghc-devs@haskell.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">#8516: Add (->) representation and the Invariant class to GHC.Generics<br>
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------<br>
Reporter: nfrisby | Owner:<br>
Type: feature request | Status: new<br>
Priority: low | Milestone:<br>
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.7<br>
checker) |<br>
Resolution: | Keywords: Generics<br>
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:<br>
| Unknown/Multiple<br>
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:<br>
Blocked By: | Blocking:<br>
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):<br>
Wiki Page: |<br>
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Comment (by RyanGlScott):<br>
<br>
And as it turns out, goldfire has a separate ticket (#8177) for the<br>
proposed idea of being able to give explicit role signatures to type<br>
families, which might make the potential regression in<br>
[<a href="https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8516#comment:7" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8516#comment:7</a> this comment] not<br>
an actual regression. See my comment<br>
[<a href="https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8177#comment:31" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8177#comment:31</a> here].<br>
<br>
--<br>
Ticket URL: <<a href="http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8516#comment:11" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8516#comment:11</a>><br>
GHC <<a href="http://www.haskell.org/ghc/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/ghc/</a>><br>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler<br>
</blockquote></div>