Initial compile time benchmarks

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Wed Mar 30 07:11:08 UTC 2016


Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2016, 15:29 -0700 schrieb Edward Z. Yang:
> This ticket may be of interest:
> 
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9630
> 
> Deriving costs a lot and we just need someone to figure out what's
> going on.

are you sure that deriving itself costs a lot? I would expect that
deriving itself is reasonably cheap, but results in a lot of
complicated (e.g. recursive) code that later analyzes have to go
through...

http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9557 and tickets linked from
there are also relevant. In fact, there is even a keyword for this
meta-issue:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=!closed&keywords=~deriving-perf

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.dehttps://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160330/29953ed4/attachment.sig>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list