[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/dmd-arity] Compute demand signatures assuming idArity

Sebastian Graf gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Fri Apr 5 13:50:31 UTC 2019



Sebastian Graf pushed to branch wip/dmd-arity at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC


Commits:
1a670dc0 by Sebastian Graf at 2019-04-05T13:50:20Z
Compute demand signatures assuming idArity

This does four things:

1. Look at `idArity` instead of manifest lambdas to decide whether to use LetUp
2. Compute the strictness signature in LetDown assuming at least `idArity`
   incoming arguments
3. Remove the special case for trivial RHSs, which is subsumed by 2
4. Don't perform the W/W split when doing so would eta expand a binding.
   Otherwise we would eta expand PAPs, causing unnecessary churn in the
   Simplifier.

NoFib Results

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Program         Allocs    Instrs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 fannkuch-redux          +0.3%      0.0%
             gg          -0.0%     -0.1%
       maillist          +0.2%     +0.2%
        minimax           0.0%     +0.8%
         pretty           0.0%     -0.1%
            scc           0.0%     -0.1%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Min          -0.0%     -0.1%
            Max          +0.3%     +0.8%
 Geometric Mean          +0.0%     +0.0%

- - - - -


17 changed files:

- compiler/basicTypes/Demand.hs
- compiler/basicTypes/Id.hs
- compiler/basicTypes/IdInfo.hs
- compiler/basicTypes/Var.hs
- compiler/coreSyn/CoreArity.hs
- compiler/coreSyn/CoreLint.hs
- compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.hs
- compiler/simplCore/SimplMonad.hs
- compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs
- compiler/stranal/DmdAnal.hs
- compiler/stranal/WorkWrap.hs
- compiler/stranal/WwLib.hs
- + testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/WWRec.hs
- testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/all.T
- + testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/NewtypeArity.hs
- + testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/NewtypeArity.stderr
- testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/all.T


Changes:

=====================================
compiler/basicTypes/Demand.hs
=====================================
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ module Demand (
 
         DmdType(..), dmdTypeDepth, lubDmdType, bothDmdType,
         nopDmdType, botDmdType, mkDmdType,
-        addDemand, removeDmdTyArgs,
+        addDemand, ensureArgs,
         BothDmdArg, mkBothDmdArg, toBothDmdArg,
 
         DmdEnv, emptyDmdEnv,
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ module Demand (
         vanillaCprProdRes, cprSumRes,
         appIsBottom, isBottomingSig, pprIfaceStrictSig,
         trimCPRInfo, returnsCPR_maybe,
-        StrictSig(..), mkStrictSig, mkClosedStrictSig,
+        StrictSig(..), mkStrictSigForArity, mkClosedStrictSig,
         nopSig, botSig, cprProdSig,
         isTopSig, hasDemandEnvSig,
         splitStrictSig, strictSigDmdEnv,
@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ module Demand (
         deferAfterIO,
         postProcessUnsat, postProcessDmdType,
 
-        splitProdDmd_maybe, peelCallDmd, peelManyCalls, mkCallDmd,
+        splitProdDmd_maybe, peelCallDmd, peelManyCalls, mkCallDmd, mkCallDmds,
         mkWorkerDemand, dmdTransformSig, dmdTransformDataConSig,
         dmdTransformDictSelSig, argOneShots, argsOneShots, saturatedByOneShots,
-        trimToType, TypeShape(..),
+        TypeShape(..), peelTsFuns, trimToType,
 
         useCount, isUsedOnce, reuseEnv,
         killUsageDemand, killUsageSig, zapUsageDemand, zapUsageEnvSig,
@@ -675,10 +675,15 @@ mkProdDmd dx
   = JD { sd = mkSProd $ map getStrDmd dx
        , ud = mkUProd $ map getUseDmd dx }
 
+-- | Wraps the 'CleanDemand' with a one-shot call demand: @d@ -> @C1(d)@.
 mkCallDmd :: CleanDemand -> CleanDemand
 mkCallDmd (JD {sd = d, ud = u})
   = JD { sd = mkSCall d, ud = mkUCall One u }
 
+-- | @mkCallDmds n d@ returns @C1(C1...(C1 d))@ where there are @n@ @C1@'s.
+mkCallDmds :: Arity -> CleanDemand -> CleanDemand
+mkCallDmds arity cd = iterate mkCallDmd cd !! arity
+
 -- See Note [Demand on the worker] in WorkWrap
 mkWorkerDemand :: Int -> Demand
 mkWorkerDemand n = JD { sd = Lazy, ud = Use One (go n) }
@@ -804,6 +809,13 @@ instance Outputable TypeShape where
   ppr (TsFun ts)   = text "TsFun" <> parens (ppr ts)
   ppr (TsProd tss) = parens (hsep $ punctuate comma $ map ppr tss)
 
+-- | @peelTsFuns n ts@ tries to peel off @n@ 'TsFun' constructors from @ts@ and
+-- returns 'Just' the wrapped 'TypeShape' on success, and 'Nothing' otherwise.
+peelTsFuns :: Arity -> TypeShape -> Maybe TypeShape
+peelTsFuns 0 ts         = Just ts
+peelTsFuns n (TsFun ts) = peelTsFuns (n-1) ts
+peelTsFuns _ _          = Nothing
+
 trimToType :: Demand -> TypeShape -> Demand
 -- See Note [Trimming a demand to a type]
 trimToType (JD { sd = ms, ud = mu }) ts
@@ -1207,12 +1219,8 @@ mkDmdType fv ds res = DmdType fv ds res
 dmdTypeDepth :: DmdType -> Arity
 dmdTypeDepth (DmdType _ ds _) = length ds
 
--- Remove any demand on arguments. This is used in dmdAnalRhs on the body
-removeDmdTyArgs :: DmdType -> DmdType
-removeDmdTyArgs = ensureArgs 0
-
--- This makes sure we can use the demand type with n arguments,
--- It extends the argument list with the correct resTypeArgDmd
+-- | This makes sure we can use the demand type with n arguments.
+-- It extends the argument list with the correct resTypeArgDmd.
 -- It also adjusts the DmdResult: Divergence survives additional arguments,
 -- CPR information does not (and definite converge also would not).
 ensureArgs :: Arity -> DmdType -> DmdType
@@ -1567,8 +1575,56 @@ and <L,U(U,U)> on the second, then returning a constructor.
 
 If this same function is applied to one arg, all we can say is that it
 uses x with <L,U>, and its arg with demand <L,U>.
+
+Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Demand types are sound approximations of an expression's semantics relative to
+the incoming demand we put the expression under. Consider the following
+expression:
+
+    \x y -> x `seq` (y, 2*x)
+
+Here is a table with demand types resulting from different incoming demands we
+put that expression under. Note the monotonicity; a stronger incoming demand
+yields a more precise demand type:
+
+    incoming demand                  |  demand type
+    ----------------------------------------------------
+    <S           ,HU              >  |  <L,U><L,U>{}
+    <C(C(S     )),C1(C1(U       ))>  |  <S,U><L,U>{}
+    <C(C(S(S,L))),C1(C1(U(1*U,A)))>  |  <S,1*HU><S,1*U>{}
+
+Note that in the first example, the depth of the demand type was *higher* than
+the arity of the incoming call demand due to the anonymous lambda.
+The converse is also possible and happens when we unleash demand signatures.
+In @f x y@, the incoming call demand on f has arity 2. But if all we have is a
+demand signature with depth 1 for @f@ (which we can safely unleash, see below),
+the demand type of @f@ under a call demand of arity 2 has a *lower* depth of 1.
+
+So: Demand types are elicited by putting an expression under an incoming (call)
+demand, the arity of which can be lower or higher than the depth of the
+resulting demand type.
+In contrast, a demand signature summarises a function's semantics *without*
+immediately specifying the incoming demand it was produced under. Despite StrSig
+being a newtype wrapper around DmdType, it actually encodes two things:
+
+  * The threshold (i.e., minimum arity) to unleash the signature
+  * A demand type that is sound to unleash when the minimum arity requirement is
+    met.
+
+Here comes the subtle part: The threshold is encoded in the wrapped demand
+type's depth! So in mkStrictSigForArity we make sure to trim the list of
+argument demands to the given threshold arity. Call sites will make sure that
+this corresponds to the arity of the call demand that elicited the wrapped
+demand type. See also Note [What are demand signatures?] in DmdAnal.
+
+Besides trimming argument demands, mkStrictSigForArity will also trim CPR
+information if necessary.
 -}
 
+-- | The depth of the wrapped 'DmdType' encodes the arity at which it is safe
+-- to unleash. Better construct this through 'mkStrictSigForArity'.
+-- See Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig]
 newtype StrictSig = StrictSig DmdType
                   deriving( Eq )
 
@@ -1580,34 +1636,43 @@ pprIfaceStrictSig :: StrictSig -> SDoc
 pprIfaceStrictSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ dmds res))
   = hcat (map ppr dmds) <> ppr res
 
-mkStrictSig :: DmdType -> StrictSig
-mkStrictSig dmd_ty = StrictSig dmd_ty
+-- | Turns a 'DmdType' computed for the particular 'Arity' into a 'StrictSig'
+-- unleashable at that arity. See Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig]
+mkStrictSigForArity :: Arity -> DmdType -> StrictSig
+mkStrictSigForArity arity dmd_ty = StrictSig (ensureArgs arity dmd_ty)
 
 mkClosedStrictSig :: [Demand] -> DmdResult -> StrictSig
-mkClosedStrictSig ds res = mkStrictSig (DmdType emptyDmdEnv ds res)
+mkClosedStrictSig ds res = mkStrictSigForArity (length ds) (DmdType emptyDmdEnv ds res)
 
 splitStrictSig :: StrictSig -> ([Demand], DmdResult)
 splitStrictSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ dmds res)) = (dmds, res)
 
 increaseStrictSigArity :: Int -> StrictSig -> StrictSig
--- Add extra arguments to a strictness signature
+-- ^ Add extra arguments to a strictness signature.
+-- In contrast to 'etaExpandStrictSig', this /prepends/ additional argument
+-- demands and leaves CPR info intact.
 increaseStrictSigArity arity_increase sig@(StrictSig dmd_ty@(DmdType env dmds res))
   | isTopDmdType dmd_ty = sig
-  | arity_increase <= 0 = sig
+  | arity_increase == 0 = sig
+  | arity_increase < 0  = WARN( True, text "increaseStrictSigArity:"
+                                  <+> text "negative arity increase"
+                                  <+> ppr arity_increase )
+                          nopSig
   | otherwise           = StrictSig (DmdType env dmds' res)
   where
     dmds' = replicate arity_increase topDmd ++ dmds
 
 etaExpandStrictSig :: Arity -> StrictSig -> StrictSig
--- We are expanding (\x y. e) to (\x y z. e z)
--- Add exta demands to the /end/ of the arg demands if necessary
-etaExpandStrictSig arity sig@(StrictSig dmd_ty@(DmdType env dmds res))
-  | isTopDmdType dmd_ty = sig
-  | arity_increase <= 0 = sig
-  | otherwise           = StrictSig (DmdType env dmds' res)
-  where
-    arity_increase = arity - length dmds
-    dmds' = dmds ++ replicate arity_increase topDmd
+-- ^ We are expanding (\x y. e) to (\x y z. e z).
+-- In contrast to 'increaseStrictSigArity', this /appends/ extra arg demands if
+-- necessary, potentially destroying the signature's CPR property.
+etaExpandStrictSig arity (StrictSig dmd_ty)
+  | arity < dmdTypeDepth dmd_ty
+  -- an arity decrease must zap the whole signature, because it was possibly
+  -- computed for a higher incoming call demand.
+  = nopSig
+  | otherwise
+  = StrictSig $ ensureArgs arity dmd_ty
 
 isTopSig :: StrictSig -> Bool
 isTopSig (StrictSig ty) = isTopDmdType ty


=====================================
compiler/basicTypes/Id.hs
=====================================
@@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ isBottomingId v
   | isId v    = isBottomingSig (idStrictness v)
   | otherwise = False
 
+-- | Accesses the 'Id''s 'strictnessInfo'.
 idStrictness :: Id -> StrictSig
 idStrictness id = strictnessInfo (idInfo id)
 


=====================================
compiler/basicTypes/IdInfo.hs
=====================================
@@ -237,22 +237,34 @@ pprIdDetails other     = brackets (pp other)
 -- too big.
 data IdInfo
   = IdInfo {
-        arityInfo       :: !ArityInfo,          -- ^ 'Id' arity
-        ruleInfo        :: RuleInfo,            -- ^ Specialisations of the 'Id's function which exist
-                                                -- See Note [Specialisations and RULES in IdInfo]
-        unfoldingInfo   :: Unfolding,           -- ^ The 'Id's unfolding
-        cafInfo         :: CafInfo,             -- ^ 'Id' CAF info
-        oneShotInfo     :: OneShotInfo,         -- ^ Info about a lambda-bound variable, if the 'Id' is one
-        inlinePragInfo  :: InlinePragma,        -- ^ Any inline pragma atached to the 'Id'
-        occInfo         :: OccInfo,             -- ^ How the 'Id' occurs in the program
-
-        strictnessInfo  :: StrictSig,      --  ^ A strictness signature
-
-        demandInfo      :: Demand,       -- ^ ID demand information
-        callArityInfo   :: !ArityInfo,   -- ^ How this is called.
-                                         -- n <=> all calls have at least n arguments
-
-        levityInfo      :: LevityInfo    -- ^ when applied, will this Id ever have a levity-polymorphic type?
+        arityInfo       :: !ArityInfo,
+        -- ^ 'Id' arity, as computed by 'CoreArity'. Specifies how many
+        -- arguments this 'Id' has to be applied to before it doesn any
+        -- meaningful work.
+        ruleInfo        :: RuleInfo,
+        -- ^ Specialisations of the 'Id's function which exist.
+        -- See Note [Specialisations and RULES in IdInfo]
+        unfoldingInfo   :: Unfolding,
+        -- ^ The 'Id's unfolding
+        cafInfo         :: CafInfo,
+        -- ^ 'Id' CAF info
+        oneShotInfo     :: OneShotInfo,
+        -- ^ Info about a lambda-bound variable, if the 'Id' is one
+        inlinePragInfo  :: InlinePragma,
+        -- ^ Any inline pragma atached to the 'Id'
+        occInfo         :: OccInfo,
+        -- ^ How the 'Id' occurs in the program
+        strictnessInfo  :: StrictSig,
+        -- ^ A strictness signature. Digests how a function uses its arguments
+        -- if applied to at least 'arityInfo' arguments.
+        demandInfo      :: Demand,
+        -- ^ ID demand information
+        callArityInfo   :: !ArityInfo,
+        -- ^ How this is called. This is the number of arguments to which a
+        -- binding can be eta-expanded without losing any sharing.
+        -- n <=> all calls have at least n arguments
+        levityInfo      :: LevityInfo
+        -- ^ when applied, will this Id ever have a levity-polymorphic type?
     }
 
 -- Setters


=====================================
compiler/basicTypes/Var.hs
=====================================
@@ -700,6 +700,8 @@ setIdNotExported id = ASSERT( isLocalId id )
 ************************************************************************
 -}
 
+-- | Is this a type-level (i.e., computationally irrelevant, thus erasable)
+-- variable? Satisfies @isTyVar = not . isId at .
 isTyVar :: Var -> Bool        -- True of both TyVar and TcTyVar
 isTyVar (TyVar {})   = True
 isTyVar (TcTyVar {}) = True
@@ -712,17 +714,21 @@ isTcTyVar _            = False
 isTyCoVar :: Var -> Bool
 isTyCoVar v = isTyVar v || isCoVar v
 
+-- | Is this a value-level (i.e., computationally relevant) 'Id'entifier?
+-- Satisfies @isId = not . isTyVar at .
 isId :: Var -> Bool
 isId (Id {}) = True
 isId _       = False
 
+-- | Is this a coercion variable?
+-- Satisfies @'isId' v ==> 'isCoVar' v == not ('isNonCoVarId' v)@.
 isCoVar :: Var -> Bool
--- A coercion variable
 isCoVar (Id { id_details = details }) = isCoVarDetails details
 isCoVar _                             = False
 
+-- | Is this a term variable ('Id') that is /not/ a coercion variable?
+-- Satisfies @'isId' v ==> 'isCoVar' v == not ('isNonCoVarId' v)@.
 isNonCoVarId :: Var -> Bool
--- A term variable (Id) that is /not/ a coercion variable
 isNonCoVarId (Id { id_details = details }) = not (isCoVarDetails details)
 isNonCoVarId _                             = False
 


=====================================
compiler/coreSyn/CoreArity.hs
=====================================
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ exprBotStrictness_maybe e
 {-
 Note [exprArity invariant]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-exprArity has the following invariant:
+exprArity has the following invariants:
 
   (1) If typeArity (exprType e) = n,
       then manifestArity (etaExpand e n) = n


=====================================
compiler/coreSyn/CoreLint.hs
=====================================
@@ -570,15 +570,9 @@ lintSingleBinding top_lvl_flag rec_flag (binder,rhs)
               (addWarnL (text "INLINE binder is (non-rule) loop breaker:" <+> ppr binder))
               -- Only non-rule loop breakers inhibit inlining
 
-      -- Check whether arity and demand type are consistent (only if demand analysis
-      -- already happened)
-      --
-      -- Note (Apr 2014): this is actually ok.  See Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]
-      --                  in DmdAnal.  After eta-expansion in CorePrep the rhs is no longer trivial.
-      --       ; let dmdTy = idStrictness binder
-      --       ; checkL (case dmdTy of
-      --                  StrictSig dmd_ty -> idArity binder >= dmdTypeDepth dmd_ty || exprIsTrivial rhs)
-      --           (mkArityMsg binder)
+       -- We used to check that the dmdTypeDepth of a demand signature never
+       -- exceeds idArity, but that is an unnecessary complication, see
+       -- Note [idArity varies independently of dmdTypeDepth] in DmdAnal
 
        -- Check that the binder's arity is within the bounds imposed by
        -- the type and the strictness signature. See Note [exprArity invariant]
@@ -2562,20 +2556,6 @@ mkKindErrMsg tyvar arg_ty
           hang (text "Arg type:")
                  4 (ppr arg_ty <+> dcolon <+> ppr (typeKind arg_ty))]
 
-{- Not needed now
-mkArityMsg :: Id -> MsgDoc
-mkArityMsg binder
-  = vcat [hsep [text "Demand type has",
-                ppr (dmdTypeDepth dmd_ty),
-                text "arguments, rhs has",
-                ppr (idArity binder),
-                text "arguments,",
-                ppr binder],
-              hsep [text "Binder's strictness signature:", ppr dmd_ty]
-
-         ]
-           where (StrictSig dmd_ty) = idStrictness binder
--}
 mkCastErr :: CoreExpr -> Coercion -> Type -> Type -> MsgDoc
 mkCastErr expr = mk_cast_err "expression" "type" (ppr expr)
 


=====================================
compiler/coreSyn/CoreUnfold.hs
=====================================
@@ -1149,15 +1149,15 @@ certainlyWillInline dflags fn_info
         -- INLINABLE functions come via this path
         --    See Note [certainlyWillInline: INLINABLE]
     do_cunf expr (UnfIfGoodArgs { ug_size = size, ug_args = args })
-      | not (null args)  -- See Note [certainlyWillInline: be careful of thunks]
+      | arityInfo fn_info > 0  -- See Note [certainlyWillInline: be careful of thunks]
       , not (isBottomingSig (strictnessInfo fn_info))
               -- Do not unconditionally inline a bottoming functions even if
               -- it seems smallish. We've carefully lifted it out to top level,
               -- so we don't want to re-inline it.
-      , let arity = length args
-      , size - (10 * (arity + 1)) <= ufUseThreshold dflags
+      , let unf_arity = length args
+      , size - (10 * (unf_arity + 1)) <= ufUseThreshold dflags
       = Just (fn_unf { uf_src      = InlineStable
-                     , uf_guidance = UnfWhen { ug_arity     = arity
+                     , uf_guidance = UnfWhen { ug_arity     = unf_arity
                                              , ug_unsat_ok  = unSaturatedOk
                                              , ug_boring_ok = inlineBoringOk expr } })
              -- Note the "unsaturatedOk". A function like  f = \ab. a
@@ -1175,6 +1175,17 @@ found that the WorkWrap phase thought that
        y = case x of F# v -> F# (v +# v)
 was certainlyWillInline, so the addition got duplicated.
 
+Note that we check arityInfo instead of the arity of the unfolding to detect
+this case. This is so that we don't accidentally fail to inline small partial
+applications, like `f = g 42` (where `g` recurses into `f`) where g has arity 2
+(say). Here there is no risk of work duplication, and the RHS is tiny, so
+certainlyWillInline should return True. But `unf_arity` is zero! However f's
+arity, gotten from `arityInfo fn_info`, is 1.
+
+Failing to say that `f` will inline forces W/W to generate a potentially huge
+worker for f that will immediately cancel with `g`'s wrapper anyway, causing
+unnecessary churn in the Simplifier while arriving at the same result.
+
 Note [certainlyWillInline: INLINABLE]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 certainlyWillInline /must/ return Nothing for a large INLINABLE thing,


=====================================
compiler/simplCore/SimplMonad.hs
=====================================
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ module SimplMonad (
 
 import GhcPrelude
 
-import Var              ( Var, isTyVar, mkLocalVar )
+import Var              ( Var, isId, mkLocalVar )
 import Name             ( mkSystemVarName )
 import Id               ( Id, mkSysLocalOrCoVar )
 import IdInfo           ( IdDetails(..), vanillaIdInfo, setArityInfo )
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ newJoinId bndrs body_ty
   = do { uniq <- getUniqueM
        ; let name       = mkSystemVarName uniq (fsLit "$j")
              join_id_ty = mkLamTypes bndrs body_ty  -- Note [Funky mkLamTypes]
-             arity      = length (filter (not . isTyVar) bndrs)
+             -- Note [idArity for join points] in SimplUtils
+             arity      = length (filter isId bndrs)
              join_arity = length bndrs
              details    = JoinId join_arity
              id_info    = vanillaIdInfo `setArityInfo` arity


=====================================
compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs
=====================================
@@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ tryEtaExpandRhs :: SimplMode -> OutId -> OutExpr
                 -> SimplM (Arity, Bool, OutExpr)
 -- See Note [Eta-expanding at let bindings]
 -- If tryEtaExpandRhs rhs = (n, is_bot, rhs') then
---   (a) rhs' has manifest arity
+--   (a) rhs' has manifest arity n
 --   (b) if is_bot is True then rhs' applied to n args is guaranteed bottom
 tryEtaExpandRhs mode bndr rhs
   | Just join_arity <- isJoinId_maybe bndr
@@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ tryEtaExpandRhs mode bndr rhs
          -- Note [Do not eta-expand join points]
          -- But do return the correct arity and bottom-ness, because
          -- these are used to set the bndr's IdInfo (#15517)
+         -- Note [idArity for join points]
 
   | otherwise
   = do { (new_arity, is_bot, new_rhs) <- try_expand
@@ -1610,6 +1611,13 @@ CorePrep comes around, the code is very likely to look more like this:
              $j2 = if n > 0 then $j1
                             else (...) eta
 
+Note [idArity for join points]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Because of Note [Do not eta-expand join points] we have it that the idArity
+of a join point is always (less than or) equal to the join arity.
+Essentially, for join points we set `idArity $j = count isId join_lam_bndrs`.
+It really can be less if there are type-level binders in join_lam_bndrs.
+
 Note [Do not eta-expand PAPs]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 We used to have old_arity = manifestArity rhs, which meant that we


=====================================
compiler/stranal/DmdAnal.hs
=====================================
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import Type
 import Coercion         ( Coercion, coVarsOfCo )
 import FamInstEnv
 import Util
-import Maybes           ( isJust )
+import Maybes           ( fromMaybe, isJust )
 import TysWiredIn
 import TysPrim          ( realWorldStatePrimTy )
 import ErrUtils         ( dumpIfSet_dyn )
@@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ dmdAnal' env dmd (App fun arg)
 --         , text "overall res dmd_ty =" <+> ppr (res_ty `bothDmdType` arg_ty) ])
     (res_ty `bothDmdType` arg_ty, App fun' arg')
 
--- this is an anonymous lambda, since @dmdAnalRhsLetDown@ uses @collectBinders@
 dmdAnal' env dmd (Lam var body)
   | isTyVar var
   = let
@@ -286,10 +285,7 @@ dmdAnal' env dmd (Case scrut case_bndr ty alts)
 -- This is used for a non-recursive local let without manifest lambdas.
 -- This is the LetUp rule in the paper “Higher-Order Cardinality Analysis”.
 dmdAnal' env dmd (Let (NonRec id rhs) body)
-  | useLetUp id rhs
-  , Nothing <- unpackTrivial rhs
-      -- dmdAnalRhsLetDown treats trivial right hand sides specially
-      -- so if we have a trival right hand side, fall through to that.
+  | useLetUp id
   = (final_ty, Let (NonRec id' rhs') body')
   where
     (body_ty, body')   = dmdAnal env dmd body
@@ -582,25 +578,6 @@ environment, which effectively assigns them 'nopSig' (see "getStrictness")
 
 -}
 
--- Trivial RHS
--- See Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]
-dmdAnalTrivialRhs ::
-    AnalEnv -> Id -> CoreExpr -> Var ->
-    (DmdEnv, Id, CoreExpr)
-dmdAnalTrivialRhs env id rhs fn
-  = (fn_fv, set_idStrictness env id fn_str, rhs)
-  where
-    fn_str = getStrictness env fn
-    fn_fv | isLocalId fn = unitVarEnv fn topDmd
-          | otherwise    = emptyDmdEnv
-    -- Note [Remember to demand the function itself]
-    -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-    -- fn_fv: don't forget to produce a demand for fn itself
-    -- Lacking this caused #9128
-    -- The demand is very conservative (topDmd), but that doesn't
-    -- matter; trivial bindings are usually inlined, so it only
-    -- kicks in for top-level bindings and NOINLINE bindings
-
 -- Let bindings can be processed in two ways:
 -- Down (RHS before body) or Up (body before RHS).
 -- dmdAnalRhsLetDown implements the Down variant:
@@ -621,28 +598,23 @@ dmdAnalRhsLetDown :: TopLevelFlag
 -- Process the RHS of the binding, add the strictness signature
 -- to the Id, and augment the environment with the signature as well.
 dmdAnalRhsLetDown top_lvl rec_flag env let_dmd id rhs
-  | Just fn <- unpackTrivial rhs   -- See Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]
-  = dmdAnalTrivialRhs env id rhs fn
-
-  | otherwise
-  = (lazy_fv, id', mkLams bndrs' body')
+  = (lazy_fv, id', rhs')
   where
-    (bndrs, body, body_dmd)
-       = case isJoinId_maybe id of
-           Just join_arity  -- See Note [Demand analysis for join points]
-                   | (bndrs, body) <- collectNBinders join_arity rhs
-                   -> (bndrs, body, let_dmd)
-
-           Nothing | (bndrs, body) <- collectBinders rhs
-                   -> (bndrs, body, mkBodyDmd env body)
-
-    env_body         = foldl' extendSigsWithLam env bndrs
-    (body_ty, body') = dmdAnal env_body body_dmd body
-    body_ty'         = removeDmdTyArgs body_ty -- zap possible deep CPR info
-    (DmdType rhs_fv rhs_dmds rhs_res, bndrs')
-                     = annotateLamBndrs env (isDFunId id) body_ty' bndrs
-    sig_ty           = mkStrictSig (mkDmdType sig_fv rhs_dmds rhs_res')
-    id'              = set_idStrictness env id sig_ty
+    rhs_arity      = idArity id
+    rhs_dmd
+      -- See Note [Demand analysis for join points]
+      -- See Note [idArity for join points] in SimplUtils
+      -- rhs_arity matches the join arity of the join point
+      | isJoinId id
+      = mkCallDmds rhs_arity let_dmd
+      | otherwise
+      -- NB: rhs_arity
+      -- See Note [Demand signatures are computed for a threshold demand based on idArity]
+      = mkRhsDmd env rhs_arity rhs
+    (DmdType rhs_fv rhs_dmds rhs_res, rhs')
+                   = dmdAnal env rhs_dmd rhs
+    sig            = mkStrictSigForArity rhs_arity (mkDmdType sig_fv rhs_dmds rhs_res')
+    id'            = set_idStrictness env id sig
         -- See Note [NOINLINE and strictness]
 
 
@@ -666,36 +638,63 @@ dmdAnalRhsLetDown top_lvl rec_flag env let_dmd id rhs
        || not (isStrictDmd (idDemandInfo id) || ae_virgin env)
           -- See Note [Optimistic CPR in the "virgin" case]
 
-mkBodyDmd :: AnalEnv -> CoreExpr -> CleanDemand
--- See Note [Product demands for function body]
-mkBodyDmd env body
-  = case deepSplitProductType_maybe (ae_fam_envs env) (exprType body) of
-       Nothing            -> cleanEvalDmd
-       Just (dc, _, _, _) -> cleanEvalProdDmd (dataConRepArity dc)
-
-unpackTrivial :: CoreExpr -> Maybe Id
--- Returns (Just v) if the arg is really equal to v, modulo
--- casts, type applications etc
--- See Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]
-unpackTrivial (Var v)                 = Just v
-unpackTrivial (Cast e _)              = unpackTrivial e
-unpackTrivial (Lam v e) | isTyVar v   = unpackTrivial e
-unpackTrivial (App e a) | isTypeArg a = unpackTrivial e
-unpackTrivial _                       = Nothing
-
--- | If given the RHS of a let-binding, this 'useLetUp' determines
--- whether we should process the binding up (body before rhs) or
--- down (rhs before body).
+-- | @mkRhsDmd env rhs_arity rhs@ creates a 'CleanDemand' for
+-- unleashing on the given function's @rhs@, by creating a call demand of
+-- @rhs_arity@ with a body demand appropriate for possible product types.
+-- See Note [Product demands for function body].
+-- For example, a call of the form @mkRhsDmd _ 2 (\x y -> (x, y))@ returns a
+-- clean usage demand of @C1(C1(U(U,U)))@.
+mkRhsDmd :: AnalEnv -> Arity -> CoreExpr -> CleanDemand
+mkRhsDmd env rhs_arity rhs = fromMaybe cleanEvalDmd $ do
+  let ts = findTypeShape (ae_fam_envs env) (exprType rhs)
+  TsProd tss <- peelTsFuns rhs_arity ts
+  pure (mkCallDmds rhs_arity (cleanEvalProdDmd (length tss)))
+
+-- | If given the let-bound 'Id', 'useLetUp' determines whether we should
+-- process the binding up (body before rhs) or down (rhs before body).
 --
--- We use LetDown if there is a chance to get a useful strictness signature.
--- This is the case when there are manifest value lambdas or the binding is a
--- join point (hence always acts like a function, not a value).
-useLetUp :: Var -> CoreExpr -> Bool
-useLetUp f _         | isJoinId f = False
-useLetUp f (Lam v e) | isTyVar v  = useLetUp f e
-useLetUp _ (Lam _ _)              = False
-useLetUp _ _                      = True
-
+-- We use LetDown if there is a chance to get a useful strictness signature to
+-- unleash at call sites. LetDown is generally more precise than LetUp if we can
+-- correctly guess how it will be used in the body, that is, for which incoming
+-- demand the strictness signature should be computed, which allows us to
+-- unleash higher-order demands on arguments at call sites. This is mostly the
+-- case when
+--
+--   * The binding takes any arguments before performing meaningful work (cf.
+--     'idArity'), in which case we are interested to see how it uses them.
+--   * The binding is a join point, hence acting like a function, not a value.
+--     As a big plus, we know *precisely* how it will be used in the body; since
+--     it's always tail-called, we can directly unleash the incoming demand of
+--     the let binding on its RHS when computing a strictness signature. See
+--     [Demand analysis for join points].
+--
+-- Thus, if the binding is not a join point and its arity is 0, we have a thunk
+-- and use LetUp, implying that we have no usable demand signature available
+-- when we analyse the let body.
+--
+-- Since thunk evaluation is memoised, we want to unleash its 'DmdEnv' of free
+-- vars at most once, regardless of how many times it was forced in the body.
+-- This makes a real difference wrt. usage demands. The other reason is being
+-- able to unleash a more precise product demand on its RHS once we know how the
+-- thunk was used in the let body.
+--
+-- Characteristic examples, always assuming a single evaluation:
+--
+--   * @let x = 2*y in x + x@ => LetUp. Compared to LetDown, we find out that
+--     the expression uses @y@ at most once.
+--   * @let x = (a,b) in fst x@ => LetUp. Compared to LetDown, we find out that
+--     @b@ is absent.
+--   * @let f x = x*2 in f y@ => LetDown. Compared to LetUp, we find out that
+--     the expression uses @y@ strictly, because we have @f@'s demand signature
+--     available at the call site.
+--   * @join exit = 2*y in if a then exit else if b then exit else 3*y@ =>
+--     LetDown. Compared to LetUp, we find out that the expression uses @y@
+--     strictly, because we can unleash @exit@'s signature at each call site.
+--   * For a more convincing example with join points, see Note [Demand analysis
+--     for join points].
+--
+useLetUp :: Var -> Bool
+useLetUp f = idArity f == 0 && not (isJoinId f)
 
 {- Note [Demand analysis for join points]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -728,22 +727,141 @@ let_dmd here).
 
 Another win for join points!  #13543.
 
+Note [Demand signatures are computed for a threshold demand based on idArity]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+We compute demand signatures assuming idArity incoming arguments to approximate
+behavior for when we have a call site with at least that many arguments. idArity
+is /at least/ the number of manifest lambdas, but might be higher for PAPs and
+trivial RHS (see Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]).
+
+Because idArity of a function varies independently of its cardinality properties
+(cf. Note [idArity varies independently of dmdTypeDepth]), we implicitly encode
+the arity for when a demand signature is sound to unleash in its 'dmdTypeDepth'
+(cf. Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig] in Demand). It is unsound to
+unleash a demand signature when the incoming number of arguments is less than
+that. See Note [What are demand signatures?] for more details on soundness.
+
+Why idArity arguments? Because that's a conservative estimate of how many
+arguments we must feed a function before it does anything interesting with them.
+Also it elegantly subsumes the trivial RHS and PAP case.
+
+There might be functions for which we might want to analyse for more incoming
+arguments than idArity. Example:
+
+  f x =
+    if expensive
+      then \y -> ... y ...
+      else \y -> ... y ...
+
+We'd analyse `f` under a unary call demand C(S), corresponding to idArity
+being 1. That's enough to look under the manifest lambda and find out how a
+unary call would use `x`, but not enough to look into the lambdas in the if
+branches.
+
+On the other hand, if we analysed for call demand C(C(S)), we'd get useful
+strictness info for `y` (and more precise info on `x`) and possibly CPR
+information, but
+
+  * We would no longer be able to unleash the signature at unary call sites
+  * Performing the worker/wrapper split based on this information would be
+    implicitly eta-expanding `f`, playing fast and loose with divergence and
+    even being unsound in the presence of newtypes, so we refrain from doing so.
+    Also see Note [Don't eta expand in w/w] in WorkWrap.
+
+Since we only compute one signature, we do so for arity 1. Computing multiple
+signatures for different arities (i.e., polyvariance) would be entirely
+possible, if it weren't for the additional runtime and implementation
+complexity.
+
+Note [idArity varies independently of dmdTypeDepth]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+We used to check in CoreLint that dmdTypeDepth <= idArity for a let-bound
+identifier. But that means we would have to zap demand signatures every time we
+reset or decrease arity. That's an unnecessary dependency, because
+
+  * The demand signature captures a semantic property that is independent of
+    what the binding's current arity is
+  * idArity is analysis information itself, thus volatile
+  * We already *have* dmdTypeDepth, wo why not just use it to encode the
+    threshold for when to unleash the signature
+    (cf. Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig] in Demand)
+
+Consider the following expression, for example:
+
+    (let go x y = `x` seq ... in go) |> co
+
+`go` might have a strictness signature of `<S><L>`. The simplifier will identify
+`go` as a nullary join point through `joinPointBinding_maybe` and float the
+coercion into the binding, leading to an arity decrease:
+
+    join go = (\x y -> `x` seq ...) |> co in go
+
+With the CoreLint check, we would have to zap `go`'s perfectly viable strictness
+signature.
+
+Note [What are demand signatures?]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Demand analysis interprets expressions in the abstract domain of demand
+transformers. Given an incoming demand we put an expression under, its abstract
+transformer gives us back a demand type denoting how other things (like
+arguments and free vars) were used when the expression was evaluated.
+Here's an example:
+
+  f x y =
+    if x + expensive
+      then \z -> z + y * ...
+      else \z -> z * ...
+
+The abstract transformer (let's call it F_e) of the if expression (let's call it
+e) would transform an incoming head demand <S,HU> into a demand type like
+{x-><S,1*U>,y-><L,U>}<L,U>. In pictures:
+
+     Demand ---F_e---> DmdType
+     <S,HU>            {x-><S,1*U>,y-><L,U>}<L,U>
+
+Let's assume that the demand transformers we compute for an expression are
+correct wrt. to some concrete semantics for Core. How do demand signatures fit
+in? They are strange beasts, given that they come with strict rules when to
+it's sound to unleash them.
+
+Fortunately, we can formalise the rules with Galois connections. Consider
+f's strictness signature, {}<S,1*U><L,U>. It's a single-point approximation of
+the actual abstract transformer of f's RHS for arity 2. So, what happens is that
+we abstract *once more* from the abstract domain we already are in, replacing
+the incoming Demand by a simple lattice with two elements denoting incoming
+arity: A_2 = {<2, >=2} (where '<2' is the top element and >=2 the bottom
+element). Here's the diagram:
+
+     A_2 -----f_f----> DmdType
+      ^                   |
+      | α               γ |
+      |                   v
+     Demand ---F_f---> DmdType
+
+With
+  α(C1(C1(_))) = >=2 -- example for usage demands, but similar for strictness
+  α(_)         =  <2
+  γ(ty)        =  ty
+and F_f being the abstract transformer of f's RHS and f_f being the abstracted
+abstract transformer computable from our demand signature simply by
+
+  f_f(>=2) = {}<S,1*U><L,U>
+  f_f(<2)  = postProcessUnsat {}<S,1*U><L,U>
+
+where postProcessUnsat makes a proper top element out of the given demand type.
+
 Note [Demand analysis for trivial right-hand sides]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Consider
-        foo = plusInt |> co
+    foo = plusInt |> co
 where plusInt is an arity-2 function with known strictness.  Clearly
 we want plusInt's strictness to propagate to foo!  But because it has
 no manifest lambdas, it won't do so automatically, and indeed 'co' might
-have type (Int->Int->Int) ~ T, so we *can't* eta-expand.  So we have a
-special case for right-hand sides that are "trivial", namely variables,
-casts, type applications, and the like.
+have type (Int->Int->Int) ~ T.
 
-Note that this can mean that 'foo' has an arity that is smaller than that
-indicated by its demand info.  e.g. if co :: (Int->Int->Int) ~ T, then
-foo's arity will be zero (see Note [exprArity invariant] in CoreArity),
-but its demand signature will be that of plusInt. A small example is the
-test case of #8963.
+Fortunately, CoreArity gives 'foo' arity 2, which is enough for LetDown to
+forward plusInt's demand signature, and all is well (see Note [Newtype arity] in
+CoreArity)! A small example is the test case NewtypeArity.
 
 
 Note [Product demands for function body]
@@ -841,13 +959,6 @@ annotateBndr env dmd_ty var
   where
     (dmd_ty', dmd) = findBndrDmd env False dmd_ty var
 
-annotateLamBndrs :: AnalEnv -> DFunFlag -> DmdType -> [Var] -> (DmdType, [Var])
-annotateLamBndrs env args_of_dfun ty bndrs = mapAccumR annotate ty bndrs
-  where
-    annotate dmd_ty bndr
-      | isId bndr = annotateLamIdBndr env args_of_dfun dmd_ty bndr
-      | otherwise = (dmd_ty, bndr)
-
 annotateLamIdBndr :: AnalEnv
                   -> DFunFlag   -- is this lambda at the top of the RHS of a dfun?
                   -> DmdType    -- Demand type of body
@@ -1160,12 +1271,6 @@ extendSigEnv top_lvl sigs var sig = extendVarEnv sigs var (sig, top_lvl)
 lookupSigEnv :: AnalEnv -> Id -> Maybe (StrictSig, TopLevelFlag)
 lookupSigEnv env id = lookupVarEnv (ae_sigs env) id
 
-getStrictness :: AnalEnv -> Id -> StrictSig
-getStrictness env fn
-  | isGlobalId fn                        = idStrictness fn
-  | Just (sig, _) <- lookupSigEnv env fn = sig
-  | otherwise                            = nopSig
-
 nonVirgin :: AnalEnv -> AnalEnv
 nonVirgin env = env { ae_virgin = False }
 


=====================================
compiler/stranal/WorkWrap.hs
=====================================
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ module WorkWrap ( wwTopBinds ) where
 
 import GhcPrelude
 
+import CoreArity        ( manifestArity )
 import CoreSyn
 import CoreUnfold       ( certainlyWillInline, mkWwInlineRule, mkWorkerUnfolding )
 import CoreUtils        ( exprType, exprIsHNF )
@@ -457,7 +458,7 @@ tryWW dflags fam_envs is_rec fn_id rhs
         -- See Note [Don't w/w INLINE things]
         -- See Note [Don't w/w inline small non-loop-breaker things]
 
-  | is_fun
+  | is_fun && is_eta_exp
   = splitFun dflags fam_envs new_fn_id fn_info wrap_dmds res_info rhs
 
   | is_thunk                                   -- See Note [Thunk splitting]
@@ -474,9 +475,11 @@ tryWW dflags fam_envs is_rec fn_id rhs
         -- See Note [Zapping DmdEnv after Demand Analyzer] and
         -- See Note [Zapping Used Once info in WorkWrap]
 
-    is_fun    = notNull wrap_dmds || isJoinId fn_id
-    is_thunk  = not is_fun && not (exprIsHNF rhs) && not (isJoinId fn_id)
-                           && not (isUnliftedType (idType fn_id))
+    is_fun     = notNull wrap_dmds || isJoinId fn_id
+    -- See Note [Don't eta expand in w/w]
+    is_eta_exp = length wrap_dmds == manifestArity rhs
+    is_thunk   = not is_fun && not (exprIsHNF rhs) && not (isJoinId fn_id)
+                            && not (isUnliftedType (idType fn_id))
 
 {-
 Note [Zapping DmdEnv after Demand Analyzer]
@@ -516,6 +519,30 @@ want to _keep_ the info for the code generator).
 
 We do not do it in the demand analyser for the same reasons outlined in
 Note [Zapping DmdEnv after Demand Analyzer] above.
+
+Note [Don't eta expand in w/w]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+A binding where the manifestArity of the RHS is less than idArity of the binder
+means CoreArity didn't eta expand that binding. When this happens, it does so
+for a reason (see Note [exprArity invariant] in CoreArity) and we probably have
+a PAP, cast or trivial expression as RHS.
+
+Performing the worker/wrapper split will implicitly eta-expand the binding to
+idArity, overriding CoreArity's decision. Other than playing fast and loose with
+divergence, it's also broken for newtypes:
+
+  f = (\xy.blah) |> co
+    where
+      co :: (Int -> Int -> Char) ~ T
+
+Then idArity is 2 (despite the type T), and it can have a StrictSig based on a
+threshold of 2. But we can't w/w it without a type error.
+
+The situation is less grave for PAPs, but the implicit eta expansion caused a
+compiler allocation regression in T15164, where huge recursive instance method
+groups, mostly consisting of PAPs, got w/w'd. This caused great churn in the
+simplifier, when simply waiting for the PAPs to inline arrived at the same
+output program.
 -}
 
 


=====================================
compiler/stranal/WwLib.hs
=====================================
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ mkWwBodies :: DynFlags
 -- wrap_fn_str E        = case x of { (a,b) ->
 --                        case a of { (a1,a2) ->
 --                        E a1 a2 b y }}
--- work_fn_str E        = \a2 a2 b y ->
+-- work_fn_str E        = \a1 a2 b y ->
 --                        let a = (a1,a2) in
 --                        let x = (a,b) in
 --                        E


=====================================
testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/WWRec.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
+
+module WWRec where
+
+class Rule f a where
+  get :: Decorator f => f a
+class Monad f => Decorator f where
+  foo :: Rule f a => f a
+
+data A1 = MkA1 A2
+data A2 = MkA2 A3
+data A3 = MkA3 A4
+data A4 = MkA4 A5
+data A5 = MkA5 A6
+data A6 = MkA6 A7
+data A7 = MkA7 A8
+data A8 = MkA8 A9
+data A9 = MkA9 A10
+data A10 = MkA10 A11
+data A11 = MkA11 A12
+data A12 = MkA12 A13
+data A13 = MkA13 A14
+data A14 = MkA14 A15
+data A15 = MkA15 A16
+data A16 = MkA16 A17
+data A17 = MkA17 A18
+data A18 = MkA18 A19
+data A19 = MkA19 A20
+data A20 = MkA20 A21
+data A21 = MkA21 A22
+data A22 = MkA22 A23
+data A23 = MkA23 A24
+data A24 = MkA24 A25
+data A25 = MkA25 A26
+data A26 = MkA26 A27
+data A27 = MkA27 A28
+data A28 = MkA28 A29
+data A29 = MkA29 A30
+data A30 = MkA30 A1
+
+instance Rule f A2 => Rule f A1 where get = MkA1 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A3 => Rule f A2 where get = MkA2 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A4 => Rule f A3 where get = MkA3 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A5 => Rule f A4 where get = MkA4 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A6 => Rule f A5 where get = MkA5 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A7 => Rule f A6 where get = MkA6 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A8 => Rule f A7 where get = MkA7 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A9 => Rule f A8 where get = MkA8 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A10 => Rule f A9 where get = MkA9 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A11 => Rule f A10 where get = MkA10 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A12 => Rule f A11 where get = MkA11 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A13 => Rule f A12 where get = MkA12 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A14 => Rule f A13 where get = MkA13 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A15 => Rule f A14 where get = MkA14 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A16 => Rule f A15 where get = MkA15 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A17 => Rule f A16 where get = MkA16 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A18 => Rule f A17 where get = MkA17 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A19 => Rule f A18 where get = MkA18 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A20 => Rule f A19 where get = MkA19 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A21 => Rule f A20 where get = MkA20 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A22 => Rule f A21 where get = MkA21 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A23 => Rule f A22 where get = MkA22 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A24 => Rule f A23 where get = MkA23 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A25 => Rule f A24 where get = MkA24 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A26 => Rule f A25 where get = MkA25 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A27 => Rule f A26 where get = MkA26 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A28 => Rule f A27 where get = MkA27 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A29 => Rule f A28 where get = MkA28 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A30 => Rule f A29 where get = MkA29 <$> foo
+instance Rule f A1 => Rule f A30 where get = MkA30 <$> foo


=====================================
testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/all.T
=====================================
@@ -393,6 +393,13 @@ test ('T15164',
       compile,
       ['-v0 -O'])
 
+# See https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/312#note_186960
+test ('WWRec',
+      [ collect_compiler_stats('bytes allocated',10)
+      ],
+      compile,
+      ['-v0 -O'])
+
 test('T16190',
       [ collect_stats(),
         when(opsys('mingw32'), expect_broken(16389))


=====================================
testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/NewtypeArity.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+-- | 't' and 't2' should have a strictness signature for arity 2 here.
+module Test where
+
+newtype T = MkT (Int -> Int -> Int)
+
+t :: T
+t = MkT (\a b -> a + b)
+
+t2 :: T
+t2 = MkT (+)


=====================================
testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/NewtypeArity.stderr
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+==================== Strictness signatures ====================
+Test.$tc'MkT: m
+Test.$tcT: m
+Test.$trModule: m
+Test.t: <S,1*U(U)><S,1*U(U)>m
+Test.t2: <S,1*U(U)><S,1*U(U)>m
+
+
+
+==================== Strictness signatures ====================
+Test.$tc'MkT: m
+Test.$tcT: m
+Test.$trModule: m
+Test.t: <S,1*U(U)><S,1*U(U)>m
+Test.t2: <S,1*U(U)><S,1*U(U)>m
+
+


=====================================
testsuite/tests/stranal/sigs/all.T
=====================================
@@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ test('BottomFromInnerLambda', normal, compile, [''])
 test('DmdAnalGADTs', normal, compile, [''])
 test('T12370', normal, compile, [''])
 test('CaseBinderCPR', normal, compile, [''])
+test('NewtypeArity', normal, compile, [''])



View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/commit/1a670dc0196aeeb37e7b452e6f1b0e28380f032f

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/commit/1a670dc0196aeeb37e7b452e6f1b0e28380f032f
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20190405/e8ae55ab/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ghc-commits mailing list