From gershomb at gmail.com Sat Jan 7 21:02:10 2017 From: gershomb at gmail.com (Gershom B) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:02:10 -0500 Subject: cabal release binaries for 1.24.0.2 ? Message-ID: I noticed that there there are no binaries for 1.24.0.2 and in fact the webpage still links the source tarball for 1.24.0.1 as the latest? It would be good to get this fixed. —Gershom From mikhail.glushenkov at gmail.com Sat Jan 7 21:12:41 2017 From: mikhail.glushenkov at gmail.com (Mikhail Glushenkov) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:12:41 +0000 Subject: cabal release binaries for 1.24.0.2 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On 7 January 2017 at 21:02, Gershom B wrote: > I noticed that there there are no binaries for 1.24.0.2 I'll build them tomorrow. BTW, can you please send me an OS X binary for 1.24.0.2? > the webpage still links the source tarball for 1.24.0.1 as the latest? Fixed. From gershomb at gmail.com Wed Jan 11 18:37:07 2017 From: gershomb at gmail.com (Gershom B) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:07 -0500 Subject: cabal release binaries for 1.24.0.2 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It seems like the binaries (aside from the os x one) aren't up yet. It would be good to have them for the new ghc and platform. --gershom On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi, > > On 7 January 2017 at 21:02, Gershom B wrote: >> I noticed that there there are no binaries for 1.24.0.2 > > I'll build them tomorrow. BTW, can you please send me an OS X binary > for 1.24.0.2? > >> the webpage still links the source tarball for 1.24.0.1 as the latest? > > Fixed. From mikhail.glushenkov at gmail.com Thu Jan 12 04:11:21 2017 From: mikhail.glushenkov at gmail.com (Mikhail Glushenkov) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:11:21 +0000 Subject: cabal release binaries for 1.24.0.2 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On 11 January 2017 at 18:37, Gershom B wrote: > It seems like the binaries (aside from the os x one) aren't up yet. It > would be good to have them for the new ghc and platform. Now they are. Sorry for dragging my feet on that.