[Hackage] #209: Implement "package()" configurations predicate

[Hackage]

#209: Implement "package()" configurations predicate
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  duncan         |        Owner:  nominolo      
      Type:  enhancement    |       Status:  new           
  Priority:  normal         |    Milestone:  Cabal-1.4     
 Component:  Cabal library  |      Version:  1.2.3.0       
  Severity:  normal         |   Resolution:                
  Keywords:                 |   Difficulty:  hard (< 1 day)
Ghcversion:  6.8.2          |     Platform:                
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by duncan):

 Replying to [comment:3 ross at soi.city.ac.uk]:
 > Another variant would be to support anonymous flags directly

 True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the uninitiated. We know to
 read the conditional syntax as an implication constraint which can be
 applied in either direction but I suspect many people read it in a
 directed functional way. I have a feeling that the anonymous flag would
 really throw people :-)

 Perhaps we should ask opinions on the libraries list.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/209#comment:4>
Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/>
Hackage: Cabal and related projects