From sp at orbitalfox.com Tue Sep 15 21:13:25 2015 From: sp at orbitalfox.com (SP) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:13:25 +0100 Subject: [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? Message-ID: <20150915211325.GA5243@darkstar> Can we have HsQML added to the repo? Thanks! -- SP From magnus at therning.org Thu Sep 17 07:36:04 2015 From: magnus at therning.org (Magnus Therning) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:36:04 +0200 Subject: [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? In-Reply-To: <20150915211325.GA5243@darkstar> References: <20150915211325.GA5243@darkstar> Message-ID: <20150917073604.GA2033@sobel.cipherstone.com> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:13:25PM +0100, SP wrote: > Can we have HsQML added to the repo? I'll have a look at it. Please create a ticket on github for it, that way I'm less likely to forget about it. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus at therning.org jabber: magnus at therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Finagle's Second Law: Always keep a record of data -- it indicates you've been working. From abimelech at gmail.com Thu Sep 17 23:05:18 2015 From: abimelech at gmail.com (Leif Warner) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:05:18 -0700 Subject: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? Message-ID: I just did "pacman -Syu", and among other things, it included an ncurses update: core/ncurses 5.9-7 -> 6.0-3 Now things like ghci, ghc-pkg, etc fail with "error while loading shared libraries: libncursesw.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" There's a libncursesw.so.6 instead, now. I suspect the ArchHaskell-provided GHC needs rebuilding against the newer ncurses? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abimelech at gmail.com Thu Sep 17 23:10:32 2015 From: abimelech at gmail.com (Leif Warner) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:10:32 -0700 Subject: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I tried downgrading back to the last ncurses version, but maybe that was a bad idea. Now every time I try to run pacman I get "error: database 'haskell-core' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))" On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Leif Warner wrote: > I just did "pacman -Syu", and among other things, it included an ncurses > update: > core/ncurses 5.9-7 -> 6.0-3 > > Now things like ghci, ghc-pkg, etc fail with "error while loading shared > libraries: libncursesw.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory" > There's a libncursesw.so.6 instead, now. I suspect the > ArchHaskell-provided GHC needs rebuilding against the newer ncurses? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stef204 at yandex.com Fri Sep 18 07:45:31 2015 From: stef204 at yandex.com (stef204) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:45:31 -0600 Subject: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1672511442562331@web28m.yandex.ru> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marcin.jan.mrotek at gmail.com Fri Sep 18 11:26:01 2015 From: marcin.jan.mrotek at gmail.com (Marcin Mrotek) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:26:01 +0200 Subject: [arch-haskell] HsQML, can we have it? In-Reply-To: <20150917073604.GA2033@sobel.cipherstone.com> References: <20150915211325.GA5243@darkstar> <20150917073604.GA2033@sobel.cipherstone.com> Message-ID: HsQML version 0.3.3.0 has outdated bounds for tagged and filepath dependencies. I wrote about it to the author about a month ago; he said he's going to upload an updated version, but apparently he didn't. The package compiles fine with bumped dependency bounds, so perhaps this could be hacked around somehow (I have no experience with creating Arch packages) Best regards, Marcin Mrotek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abimelech at gmail.com Fri Sep 18 19:53:11 2015 From: abimelech at gmail.com (Leif Warner) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:53:11 -0700 Subject: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? In-Reply-To: <1672511442562331@web28m.yandex.ru> References: <1672511442562331@web28m.yandex.ru> Message-ID: Saw a workaround on IRC; posted it to the issue on github: https://github.com/archhaskell/habs/issues/202#issuecomment-141550410 Basically, copying the libncursesw.so.5.9 file out of the old package to /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5 seems to work. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:45 AM, stef204 wrote: > > > 17.09.2015, 17:10, "Leif Warner" : > > I tried downgrading back to the last ncurses version, but maybe that was a > bad idea. Now every time I try to run pacman I get "error: database > 'haskell-core' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))" > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Leif Warner wrote: > > I just did "pacman -Syu", and among other things, it included an ncurses > update: > core/ncurses 5.9-7 -> 6.0-3 > > Now things like ghci, ghc-pkg, etc fail with "error while loading shared > libraries: libncursesw.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory" > There's a libncursesw.so.6 instead, now. I suspect the > ArchHaskell-provided GHC needs rebuilding against the newer ncurses? > > > Same situation here, I believe ghc (and more packages?) should be rebuilt > against the new ncurses but this fails. > > Gentoo has some reference to this: > > < > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7806492.html?sid=bf394ed6ab70b57c0806d371f6940965 > > > > and a bug report here: > > > > I haven't applied the suggestions yet as I wanted to get feedback from > this list and Magnus (perhaps?) first.... > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-haskell mailing list > arch-haskell at haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stef204 at yandex.com Fri Sep 18 20:21:00 2015 From: stef204 at yandex.com (stef204) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:21:00 -0600 Subject: [arch-haskell] Rebuild GHC against newer ncurses? In-Reply-To: References: <1672511442562331@web28m.yandex.ru> Message-ID: <135261442607660@web13g.yandex.ru> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: